Soil Sustainability Assessment for Rice Cropping Recommendations: A Case Study in An Giang Province, Vietnam

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
P. Vu, V. Minh
{"title":"Soil Sustainability Assessment for Rice Cropping Recommendations: A Case Study in An Giang Province, Vietnam","authors":"P. Vu, V. Minh","doi":"10.18805/ijare.af-776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study aimed to identify the sustainability of soil fertility and social-economic factors for major rice cropping and offer suggestions for sustainable rice cropping. Methods: The kite sustainability assessment is a multi-objective assessment method based on standardized scoring formulas built on land assessment criteria with limiting factors. It used the AHP method to determine how different critical factors affect whether a place is good for growing rice. The soil fertility, economics, and social factors were also significant in determining whether or not rice could grow there and how well it might do. Results: The soil fertility status of the two main rice cropping in the study area has low pH, high organic matter content, high cation exchange capacity, and high clay content. Besides, the soil has a good water-holding capacity, high total N content, and average total P content. Utilizing the AHP method, it was determined that soil fertility, economic, and social factors were the second-most significant factors in determining the suitability of land for agriculture as well as the possibility and performance of rice. While the double-rice cropping model is only sustainable regarding fertility, the triple-rice cropping model achieves the sustainability goal of economic, social, and soil fertility indicators. Two rice cropping seasons, lWS-mSA (double rice) and mWS-eSA-eAW (triple rice), achieve a balanced level in all indicators of level 2 of soil fertility. Therefore, in both models, a system that reaches a sustainable level exists. Even so, the lWS-mSA cropping season could be less harmful to the environment than the mWS-eSA-eAW season in terms of the environmental group.\n","PeriodicalId":13398,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.af-776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to identify the sustainability of soil fertility and social-economic factors for major rice cropping and offer suggestions for sustainable rice cropping. Methods: The kite sustainability assessment is a multi-objective assessment method based on standardized scoring formulas built on land assessment criteria with limiting factors. It used the AHP method to determine how different critical factors affect whether a place is good for growing rice. The soil fertility, economics, and social factors were also significant in determining whether or not rice could grow there and how well it might do. Results: The soil fertility status of the two main rice cropping in the study area has low pH, high organic matter content, high cation exchange capacity, and high clay content. Besides, the soil has a good water-holding capacity, high total N content, and average total P content. Utilizing the AHP method, it was determined that soil fertility, economic, and social factors were the second-most significant factors in determining the suitability of land for agriculture as well as the possibility and performance of rice. While the double-rice cropping model is only sustainable regarding fertility, the triple-rice cropping model achieves the sustainability goal of economic, social, and soil fertility indicators. Two rice cropping seasons, lWS-mSA (double rice) and mWS-eSA-eAW (triple rice), achieve a balanced level in all indicators of level 2 of soil fertility. Therefore, in both models, a system that reaches a sustainable level exists. Even so, the lWS-mSA cropping season could be less harmful to the environment than the mWS-eSA-eAW season in terms of the environmental group.
水稻种植建议的土壤可持续性评价:以越南安江省为例
背景:本研究旨在识别水稻主要种植的土壤肥力可持续性和社会经济因素,为水稻可持续种植提供建议。方法:风筝可持续性评价是一种基于带有限制因素的土地评价标准的标准化评分公式的多目标评价方法。它使用AHP方法来确定不同的关键因素如何影响一个地方是否适合种植水稻。土壤肥力、经济和社会因素在决定水稻是否能在那里生长以及它能长得多好方面也很重要。结果:研究区两种主要水稻作物土壤肥力状况为pH值低、有机质含量高、阳离子交换量大、粘粒含量高。土壤保水能力好,全氮含量高,全磷含量平均较高。利用层次分析法,确定土壤肥力、经济和社会因素是决定农业用地适宜性以及水稻种植可能性和产量的第二重要因素。双季稻模式仅在肥力方面具有可持续性,而三季稻模式则实现了经济、社会和土壤肥力指标的可持续性目标。lWS-mSA(双稻)和mWS-eSA-eAW(三稻)两个水稻种植季节土壤肥力二级指标均达到平衡水平。因此,在这两个模型中,都存在一个达到可持续水平的系统。即便如此,从环保组织的角度来看,lWS-mSA种植季节对环境的危害可能比mWS-eSA-eAW种植季节要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research
Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信