{"title":"Histopathologic features and parameters predicting recurrence potential of small renal masses.","authors":"Senad Bajramović, Berina Hasanović, Jasmin Alić, Nirvana Šabanović Bajramović, Damir Aganović","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced masses with a diameter of ≤4 cm, usually consistent with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to explore the histopathological features of a contemporary series of SRMs and investigate parameters that could predict their pathological nature, metastatic potential, and recurrence potential.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Small renal masses were identified in 166 of 427 patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC. The radical nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy ratio was 1:44, and autotransplantation was performed in a single case. Variables associated with metastatic recurrence of SRM were analyzed using χ<sup>2</sup> and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma was confirmed in 86% (n = 143) of cases, whereas benign tumors were present in 14% (n = 23) of cases. Seventeen percent of the RCC cases were high-grade (Fuhrman G3-4). Among SRMs with a diameter of >2 cm, 71% were malignant. The mean ± standard deviation diameter of the removed SRMs was 28 ± 12 mm, significantly higher in the malignant SRMs group (31 ± 8 vs. 24 ± 9 mm) (<i>p</i> = 0.005). During follow-up, local recurrence was identified in 4 patients versus new distant metastasis in 11 patients. Metastatic lesions were detected in the lungs (1.8%), bone (1.2%), distant (1.9%) and regional lymph nodes (1.2%), liver (0.6%), and multiple organs (2.4%). Patients with malignant SRMs were significantly older than those with benign tumors (<i>p</i> = 0.036). The multivariate analysis identified tumor size, Fuhrman grade, stage, nodal and distant metastasis status, tumor localization, and treatment modality as characteristics significant for tumor recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of treated neoplasms were malignant, but their incidence was low among SRMs with a diameter of <2 cm. Our results emphasized the importance of histopathological features and treatment modalities in predicting malignant recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":" ","pages":"192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced masses with a diameter of ≤4 cm, usually consistent with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to explore the histopathological features of a contemporary series of SRMs and investigate parameters that could predict their pathological nature, metastatic potential, and recurrence potential.
Materials and methods: Small renal masses were identified in 166 of 427 patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC. The radical nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy ratio was 1:44, and autotransplantation was performed in a single case. Variables associated with metastatic recurrence of SRM were analyzed using χ2 and logistic regression models.
Results: Renal cell carcinoma was confirmed in 86% (n = 143) of cases, whereas benign tumors were present in 14% (n = 23) of cases. Seventeen percent of the RCC cases were high-grade (Fuhrman G3-4). Among SRMs with a diameter of >2 cm, 71% were malignant. The mean ± standard deviation diameter of the removed SRMs was 28 ± 12 mm, significantly higher in the malignant SRMs group (31 ± 8 vs. 24 ± 9 mm) (p = 0.005). During follow-up, local recurrence was identified in 4 patients versus new distant metastasis in 11 patients. Metastatic lesions were detected in the lungs (1.8%), bone (1.2%), distant (1.9%) and regional lymph nodes (1.2%), liver (0.6%), and multiple organs (2.4%). Patients with malignant SRMs were significantly older than those with benign tumors (p = 0.036). The multivariate analysis identified tumor size, Fuhrman grade, stage, nodal and distant metastasis status, tumor localization, and treatment modality as characteristics significant for tumor recurrence.
Conclusions: The majority of treated neoplasms were malignant, but their incidence was low among SRMs with a diameter of <2 cm. Our results emphasized the importance of histopathological features and treatment modalities in predicting malignant recurrence.