Positive, Negative or Both? Assessing Emotional Appeals Effectiveness in Anti-Drink Driving Advertisements

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Murooj Yousef, Timo Dietrich, G. Torrisi
{"title":"Positive, Negative or Both? Assessing Emotional Appeals Effectiveness in Anti-Drink Driving Advertisements","authors":"Murooj Yousef, Timo Dietrich, G. Torrisi","doi":"10.1177/15245004211025068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of advertising to influence social behavior is one element of social marketing campaigns. While it is known that informational appeals are less effective in changing social perceptions and behaviors, the literature presents mixed and inconsistent results of which appeal (i.e. positive negative or both) is more effective in changing social behavior. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of positive, negative and a combination of both appeals on young adults’ drink driving perceptions. Focus: This article is related to research and evaluation of the social marketing field. Research Question: Which, if any, of positive, negative or combination of both emotional appeals, is most effective in changing young adults’ drink driving attitudes, norms and intentions and how well do intentions explain behavior? Importance to the Field: The study builds on, and extends previous research exploring the effectiveness of emotional appeals, contributing to the literature by exploring both emotional appeals along the testing of each appeal separately. The research also validates the TRA’s utility beyond previously explored contexts. At a practical level, the research informs the work of advertising message design. It is recommended that, social marketers consider combined emotional appeals approach when designing messages. Methods: Respondents were randomly exposed to one of three emotional appeals (positive, negative or both) and asked to complete a questionnaire about their attitudes, norms and intentions to drink drive before and after exposure. Two analyses were used, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to validate the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), and paired sample t-tests to assess change of perceptions over time between the three groups. Results: First the study found the TRA to have a strong predictive utility in explaining drink driving intentions. Second, the combination of both positive and negative emotional appeals was found more effective in changing drink driving attitudes, norms and intentions of young adults. Recommendations for Research or Practice: The study recommends that, social marketers consider combined emotional appeals approach when designing messages. However, further investigation is required to confirm this recommendation and as in any campaign, pre-testing the advertisements with the target audience is a must. Limitations: The key limitations of the study include the use of non-probability sampling, self-reported data, and varied exposure times. Future research should utilize autonomic measures to accurately assess perceptions and emotions as well as unifying the time of exposure for all emotional appeals.","PeriodicalId":46085,"journal":{"name":"Social Marketing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15245004211025068","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004211025068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: The use of advertising to influence social behavior is one element of social marketing campaigns. While it is known that informational appeals are less effective in changing social perceptions and behaviors, the literature presents mixed and inconsistent results of which appeal (i.e. positive negative or both) is more effective in changing social behavior. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of positive, negative and a combination of both appeals on young adults’ drink driving perceptions. Focus: This article is related to research and evaluation of the social marketing field. Research Question: Which, if any, of positive, negative or combination of both emotional appeals, is most effective in changing young adults’ drink driving attitudes, norms and intentions and how well do intentions explain behavior? Importance to the Field: The study builds on, and extends previous research exploring the effectiveness of emotional appeals, contributing to the literature by exploring both emotional appeals along the testing of each appeal separately. The research also validates the TRA’s utility beyond previously explored contexts. At a practical level, the research informs the work of advertising message design. It is recommended that, social marketers consider combined emotional appeals approach when designing messages. Methods: Respondents were randomly exposed to one of three emotional appeals (positive, negative or both) and asked to complete a questionnaire about their attitudes, norms and intentions to drink drive before and after exposure. Two analyses were used, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to validate the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), and paired sample t-tests to assess change of perceptions over time between the three groups. Results: First the study found the TRA to have a strong predictive utility in explaining drink driving intentions. Second, the combination of both positive and negative emotional appeals was found more effective in changing drink driving attitudes, norms and intentions of young adults. Recommendations for Research or Practice: The study recommends that, social marketers consider combined emotional appeals approach when designing messages. However, further investigation is required to confirm this recommendation and as in any campaign, pre-testing the advertisements with the target audience is a must. Limitations: The key limitations of the study include the use of non-probability sampling, self-reported data, and varied exposure times. Future research should utilize autonomic measures to accurately assess perceptions and emotions as well as unifying the time of exposure for all emotional appeals.
阳性、阴性还是两者兼有?反酒驾广告情感诉求效果评价
背景:利用广告影响社会行为是社会营销活动的一个要素。虽然众所周知,信息诉求在改变社会认知和行为方面效果较差,但文献呈现出混合和不一致的结果,其中诉求(即积极-消极或两者兼有)在改变社会行为方面更有效。本研究的目的是调查积极、消极和两者结合对年轻人酒后驾驶认知的有效性。焦点:本文涉及社会营销领域的研究与评价。研究问题:在改变年轻人的酒后驾驶态度、规范和意图方面,积极的、消极的或两种情绪诉求的组合中哪一种(如果有的话)最有效,以及意图在多大程度上解释行为?对该领域的重要性:该研究建立在并扩展了先前探索情感诉求有效性的研究基础上,通过分别探索两种情感诉求和对每种诉求的测试,为文献做出了贡献。该研究还验证了TRA在先前探索的背景之外的效用。在实践层面上,本研究为广告信息设计工作提供了依据。建议社交营销人员在设计信息时考虑采用情感诉求相结合的方法。方法:受访者被随机暴露于三种情绪诉求中的一种(积极、消极或两者兼有),并被要求填写一份关于他们在暴露前后酒后驾车的态度、规范和意图的问卷。使用了两种分析,偏最小二乘结构方程建模来验证理性行动理论(TRA),以及配对样本t检验来评估三组之间感知随时间的变化。结果:首先,研究发现TRA在解释酒后驾驶意图方面具有很强的预测效用。其次,积极和消极情绪诉求的结合被发现在改变年轻人的酒后驾驶态度、规范和意图方面更有效。研究或实践建议:该研究建议,社交营销人员在设计信息时考虑综合情感诉求方法。然而,需要进一步的调查来证实这一建议,在任何活动中,都必须对目标受众进行广告预测试。局限性:该研究的主要局限性包括使用非概率抽样、自我报告的数据和不同的暴露时间。未来的研究应该利用自主测量来准确评估感知和情绪,并统一所有情绪诉求的暴露时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信