Registered reports coming soon: our contribution to better science in football research

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
F. Impellizzeri, A. McCall, T. Meyer
{"title":"Registered reports coming soon: our contribution to better science in football research","authors":"F. Impellizzeri, A. McCall, T. Meyer","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2019.1603659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sport science research like any other field suffers from what has been called ‘questionable research practice’, a likely consequence of the ‘publish or perish’ culture, that is, the pressure in academia to produce scientific articles (John et al. 2012). A more recent reason that is specific to the field of football research may also be attributable to the growing number of practitioners from team sports publishing scientific articles although they may not have had the appropriate training in research methodology to the level required for robust science. John et al. (2012) reported a series of bad practices that were admitted by a sample of 2155 academic psychologists relating to their research field:","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"3 1","pages":"87 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2019.1603659","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2019.1603659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Sport science research like any other field suffers from what has been called ‘questionable research practice’, a likely consequence of the ‘publish or perish’ culture, that is, the pressure in academia to produce scientific articles (John et al. 2012). A more recent reason that is specific to the field of football research may also be attributable to the growing number of practitioners from team sports publishing scientific articles although they may not have had the appropriate training in research methodology to the level required for robust science. John et al. (2012) reported a series of bad practices that were admitted by a sample of 2155 academic psychologists relating to their research field:
注册报告即将发布:我们对足球研究科学的贡献
与任何其他领域一样,体育科学研究也受到所谓的“可疑研究实践”的影响,这可能是“要么发表,要么灭亡”文化的后果,即学术界发表科学文章的压力(John等人,2012)。足球研究领域特有的一个最近的原因也可能是,越来越多的团队运动从业者发表科学文章,尽管他们可能没有接受过足够的研究方法培训,达到稳健科学所需的水平。John等人(2012)报告了2155名与其研究领域相关的学术心理学家样本所承认的一系列不良行为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书