The Reasons for the Absence of Aging PoliciesinIndonesian Universities: A Case Study of Two Fully Autonomous Public Universities

A. P. Ramadhan, Suzyrman Sibly, Hamoon Khelghat-Doost
{"title":"The Reasons for the Absence of Aging PoliciesinIndonesian Universities: A Case Study of Two Fully Autonomous Public Universities","authors":"A. P. Ramadhan, Suzyrman Sibly, Hamoon Khelghat-Doost","doi":"10.25133/jpssv302022.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, more than 27% of academic staff at Indonesian public universities were over 60, suggesting the importance of clearly stated policies on aging in these institutions. However, an aging policy is still absent in public universities. Thus, the purpose of this study is to ascertain why Indonesian public universities lack a distinct policy for their older academic staff. An exploratory qualitative approach was employed in this study. Two fully autonomous and well-known public universities in Indonesia were chosen as case studies. The selected members of top management of these universities comprising the rector, vice-rectors, and directors were individually interviewed. The result of the study revealed that these institutions do not have a specified aging policy. The result also highlighted eight reasons why public universities do not have an aging policy in their institution. The study suggests further investigation of the reasons for the absence of aging policies in Indonesian universities are carried out using a large sample size within fully autonomous public universities, non-fully autonomous public universities, and private universities to delve deeper into the reasons for the absence of an aging policy.","PeriodicalId":85846,"journal":{"name":"Warasan prachakon lae sangkhom = Journal of population and social studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Warasan prachakon lae sangkhom = Journal of population and social studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25133/jpssv302022.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2019, more than 27% of academic staff at Indonesian public universities were over 60, suggesting the importance of clearly stated policies on aging in these institutions. However, an aging policy is still absent in public universities. Thus, the purpose of this study is to ascertain why Indonesian public universities lack a distinct policy for their older academic staff. An exploratory qualitative approach was employed in this study. Two fully autonomous and well-known public universities in Indonesia were chosen as case studies. The selected members of top management of these universities comprising the rector, vice-rectors, and directors were individually interviewed. The result of the study revealed that these institutions do not have a specified aging policy. The result also highlighted eight reasons why public universities do not have an aging policy in their institution. The study suggests further investigation of the reasons for the absence of aging policies in Indonesian universities are carried out using a large sample size within fully autonomous public universities, non-fully autonomous public universities, and private universities to delve deeper into the reasons for the absence of an aging policy.
印尼大学老龄化政策缺失的原因——以两所完全自主的公立大学为例
2019年,印尼公立大学超过27%的教职员工年龄在60岁以上,这表明这些机构明确制定老龄化政策的重要性。然而,公立大学仍然没有老龄化政策。因此,本研究的目的是确定为什么印尼公立大学对其年长的学术人员缺乏明确的政策。本研究采用了探索性的定性方法。选择了印度尼西亚两所完全自治的知名公立大学作为案例研究。这些大学的高层管理人员(包括校长、副校长和校长)分别接受了采访。研究结果表明,这些机构没有具体的老龄化政策。研究结果还强调了公立大学没有老龄化政策的八个原因。该研究表明,对印度尼西亚大学缺乏老龄化政策的原因进行了进一步调查,在完全自治的公立大学、非完全自治的私立大学和私立大学中使用了大量样本,以深入研究缺乏老龄化政策的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书