Validación del Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) en Universitarios de Buenos Aires, Argentina [Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Its validation for undergraduates from Buenos Aires, Argentina]

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Agustín Freiberg Hoffmann, A. R. Medina
{"title":"Validación del Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) en Universitarios de Buenos Aires, Argentina [Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Its validation for undergraduates from Buenos Aires, Argentina]","authors":"Agustín Freiberg Hoffmann, A. R. Medina","doi":"10.5944/ap.16.2.23042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumen Los enfoques de aprendizaje permiten conocer las preferencias que manifiestan las personas para enfrentar una tarea de aprendizaje especifica. Una de las herramientas mas difundidas para evaluar los enfoques de aprendizaje es el Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST), que en su version abreviada permite valorar mediante 18 items tres enfoques de aprendizaje (Profundo, Superficial, Estrategico). Dada la importancia que este instrumento tiene para evaluar los enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios, el objetivo de esta investigacion es validar la version espanola para el contexto argentino. Para ello se adecuo primero linguisticamente el inventario a los modismos locales, para luego examinar evidencias de validez de constructo (analisis factorial exploratorio, confirmatorio, e invarianza factorial) y evidencias de validez concurrente. Tambien se estudio la confiabilidad del instrumento mediante el analisis de consistencia interna. Se obtuvo una herramienta compuesta de 14 reactivos que posibilita evaluar los enfoques de aprendizaje Profundo, Superficial y Estrategico propuestos por la teoria. El modelo resultante de los procedimientos exploratorio y confirmatorio exhibio una adecuada invarianza factorial, y las dimensiones del inventario presentaron indices de consistencia interna superiores a .80. Ademas se obtuvieron evidencias de validez concurrente coherentes con la teoria y con resultados empiricos previos.  Abstract The study of approaches to learning enables the descrip­tion of preferences manifested when facing a specific learning task. One of the most widespread instruments for assessing learning approaches is the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). In its short version of 18 items, the ASSIST measures three learning approaches (Deep, Surface and Strategic). Given that the availability of this instrument would be of great value and needed to research learning approaches in college stu­dents, the objective of this research was to develop an Ar­gentinean version. To meet this end, the inventory under­went an initial linguistic adaptation to the local forms of expression and idioms. Then, construct validity was ex­amined (exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis, and factorial invariance) together with analyses of concur­rent validity. Reliability was examined by means of anal­yses of internal consistency. The resulting 14-item instru­ment may be used to describe approaches to learning as proposed by the theory: Deep, Superficial and Strategic. The measure obtained by exploratory and confirmatory procedures showed an adequate factorial invariance. The dimensions of the inventory had internal consistency in­dexes greater than .80. Finally, evidences of concurrent validity were coherent with the theory and with previous empirical results.","PeriodicalId":43927,"journal":{"name":"Accion Psicologica","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/ap.16.2.23042","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accion Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.16.2.23042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Resumen Los enfoques de aprendizaje permiten conocer las preferencias que manifiestan las personas para enfrentar una tarea de aprendizaje especifica. Una de las herramientas mas difundidas para evaluar los enfoques de aprendizaje es el Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST), que en su version abreviada permite valorar mediante 18 items tres enfoques de aprendizaje (Profundo, Superficial, Estrategico). Dada la importancia que este instrumento tiene para evaluar los enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios, el objetivo de esta investigacion es validar la version espanola para el contexto argentino. Para ello se adecuo primero linguisticamente el inventario a los modismos locales, para luego examinar evidencias de validez de constructo (analisis factorial exploratorio, confirmatorio, e invarianza factorial) y evidencias de validez concurrente. Tambien se estudio la confiabilidad del instrumento mediante el analisis de consistencia interna. Se obtuvo una herramienta compuesta de 14 reactivos que posibilita evaluar los enfoques de aprendizaje Profundo, Superficial y Estrategico propuestos por la teoria. El modelo resultante de los procedimientos exploratorio y confirmatorio exhibio una adecuada invarianza factorial, y las dimensiones del inventario presentaron indices de consistencia interna superiores a .80. Ademas se obtuvieron evidencias de validez concurrente coherentes con la teoria y con resultados empiricos previos.  Abstract The study of approaches to learning enables the descrip­tion of preferences manifested when facing a specific learning task. One of the most widespread instruments for assessing learning approaches is the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). In its short version of 18 items, the ASSIST measures three learning approaches (Deep, Surface and Strategic). Given that the availability of this instrument would be of great value and needed to research learning approaches in college stu­dents, the objective of this research was to develop an Ar­gentinean version. To meet this end, the inventory under­went an initial linguistic adaptation to the local forms of expression and idioms. Then, construct validity was ex­amined (exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis, and factorial invariance) together with analyses of concur­rent validity. Reliability was examined by means of anal­yses of internal consistency. The resulting 14-item instru­ment may be used to describe approaches to learning as proposed by the theory: Deep, Superficial and Strategic. The measure obtained by exploratory and confirmatory procedures showed an adequate factorial invariance. The dimensions of the inventory had internal consistency in­dexes greater than .80. Finally, evidences of concurrent validity were coherent with the theory and with previous empirical results.
阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯大学学生方法和学习技能清单的有效性
摘要学习方法可以了解人们对特定学习任务的偏好。评估学习方法的最广泛工具之一是《学生方法和学习技能清单》,该清单的简写本允许通过18个项目对三种学习方法(深度、浅层、策略)进行评估。鉴于该工具在评估大学生学习方法方面的重要性,本研究的目的是验证阿根廷背景下的西班牙语版本。为此,首先在语言上使清单适应当地习惯用法,然后检查结构有效性的证据(探索性、确认性和因素不变性因素分析)和同时有效性的证据。通过内部一致性分析,研究了仪器的可靠性。获得了一个由14种试剂组成的工具,可以评估该理论提出的深度、浅层和战略学习方法。探索性和确认性程序产生的模型显示出足够的因子不变性,库存维度的内部一致性指数超过.80。此外,还获得了与理论和先前经验结果一致的同时有效性证据。摘要对学习方法的研究使描述在面对特定的学习任务时表现出的偏好成为可能。评估学习方法的最广泛工具之一是学生方法和学习技能清单(ASSIST)。在18个项目的简短版本中,援助衡量了三种学习方法(深度、表面和战略)。鉴于这一工具的可用性对于研究大学生的学习方法将具有很大的价值和必要性,这项研究的目的是开发一个通用版本。为了实现这一目标,该清单对当地的表达形式和习语进行了初步的语言调整。然后,结合竞争有效性分析,分析了结构有效性(探索性和确认性因素分析以及因素不变性)。通过内部一致性分析检查了可靠性。结果14-项目工具可用于描述理论提出的学习方法:深入、肤浅和战略。探索性和确认性程序获得的措施显示出足够的因子不变性。该清单的维度在指数中的内部一致性超过.80。最后,同时有效性的证据与理论和以前的经验结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accion Psicologica
Accion Psicologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信