Universities as an Arena of Contentious politics: mobilization and control in Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition movement of 2019

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ming-sho Ho, Wai Ki Wan
{"title":"Universities as an Arena of Contentious politics: mobilization and control in Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition movement of 2019","authors":"Ming-sho Ho, Wai Ki Wan","doi":"10.1080/09620214.2021.2007503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the role of university students during the anti-extradition movement in Hong Kong, analyzing their strategy to mobilize schools’ physical, symbolic, and interpersonal resources, and how the authorities reacted by restricting and redefining key resources. Universities have served as a safe space since police officers traditionally are not allowed to enter them. Some schools are also strategically located to allow for more disruptive protests. Since Confucianism venerates the moral value of learning, universities are perceived as a hallowed symbol of intellectual conscience, justifying students’ defiance. Universities are commonly seen as warm families whose leaders are obliged to protect students. Finally, universities sustain a rich network of cross-mobilization. The regime restricts access to resources by tightening campus control and reshuffling university leadership, and redefined the symbolic meanings by discrediting higher education. We find interpersonal relationships constitute the most resilient resource because they are embedded in everyday life common identities.","PeriodicalId":45706,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"313 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2007503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the role of university students during the anti-extradition movement in Hong Kong, analyzing their strategy to mobilize schools’ physical, symbolic, and interpersonal resources, and how the authorities reacted by restricting and redefining key resources. Universities have served as a safe space since police officers traditionally are not allowed to enter them. Some schools are also strategically located to allow for more disruptive protests. Since Confucianism venerates the moral value of learning, universities are perceived as a hallowed symbol of intellectual conscience, justifying students’ defiance. Universities are commonly seen as warm families whose leaders are obliged to protect students. Finally, universities sustain a rich network of cross-mobilization. The regime restricts access to resources by tightening campus control and reshuffling university leadership, and redefined the symbolic meanings by discrediting higher education. We find interpersonal relationships constitute the most resilient resource because they are embedded in everyday life common identities.
大学是充满争议的政治舞台:2019年香港反腐败运动的动员与控制
本文考察了大学生在香港反引渡运动中的作用,分析了他们动员学校物质、象征和人际资源的策略,以及当局如何通过限制和重新定义关键资源来应对。传统上警察是不允许进入大学的,因此大学一直是一个安全的空间。一些学校的地理位置也具有战略意义,允许发生更具破坏性的抗议活动。由于儒家思想推崇学习的道德价值,大学被视为知识良知的神圣象征,为学生的反抗提供了理由。大学通常被视为温暖的家庭,其领导人有义务保护学生。最后,大学维持着一个丰富的交叉动员网络。该政权通过加强校园控制和重组大学领导层来限制对资源的获取,并通过诋毁高等教育来重新定义象征意义。我们发现人际关系构成了最具弹性的资源,因为它们植根于日常生活中的共同身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: International Studies in Sociology of Education is an international journal and publishes papers in the sociology of education which critically engage with theoretical and empirical issues, drawn from as wide a range of perspectives as possible. It aims to move debates forward. The journal is international in outlook and readership and receives papers from around the world. The journal publishes four issues a year; the first three are devoted to a particular theme while the fourth is an "open" issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信