Differences between teacher reports on universal risk assessments

Marissa Smith-Millman, P. Flaspohler, M. Maras, J. Splett, Kristy Warmbold, Hannah Dinnen, A. Luebbe
{"title":"Differences between teacher reports on universal risk assessments","authors":"Marissa Smith-Millman, P. Flaspohler, M. Maras, J. Splett, Kristy Warmbold, Hannah Dinnen, A. Luebbe","doi":"10.1080/1754730X.2017.1333914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Some universal behavioural screening processes require classroom teachers to complete a risk assessment measure on each student in their class, leading to a possible, but unexplored, problem: risk assessment scores may be influenced by the teacher completing the measure. The current study investigated whether teacher-reported risk assessment scores systematically differ between teachers and whether they differ across both deficit- and strengths-based risk assessment measures. Results from this study indicated that between 7.7 and 20.5% of the variance in risk assessment scores was attributable to between-teacher differences. These findings underscore the need to account for and control between-teacher differences in teacher-reported risk assessments.","PeriodicalId":89653,"journal":{"name":"Advances in school mental health promotion","volume":"10 1","pages":"235 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1754730X.2017.1333914","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in school mental health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2017.1333914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract Some universal behavioural screening processes require classroom teachers to complete a risk assessment measure on each student in their class, leading to a possible, but unexplored, problem: risk assessment scores may be influenced by the teacher completing the measure. The current study investigated whether teacher-reported risk assessment scores systematically differ between teachers and whether they differ across both deficit- and strengths-based risk assessment measures. Results from this study indicated that between 7.7 and 20.5% of the variance in risk assessment scores was attributable to between-teacher differences. These findings underscore the need to account for and control between-teacher differences in teacher-reported risk assessments.
教师报告中普遍风险评估的差异
摘要一些普遍的行为筛查过程要求课堂教师对班上的每个学生完成风险评估测量,这导致了一个可能但尚未探索的问题:风险评估分数可能会受到完成测量的教师的影响。目前的研究调查了教师报告的风险评估分数是否在教师之间存在系统性差异,以及在基于缺陷和优势的风险评估措施中是否存在差异。这项研究的结果表明,风险评估分数的7.7%-20.5%的差异归因于教师之间的差异。这些发现强调了在教师报告的风险评估中解释和控制教师差异的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信