Incidence, Epidemiology and Clinico-Pathological Status of Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in NICRH, Dhaka

A. Bhattacharjee, Afm Anwar Hossain, S. Yeasmin, T. Akter
{"title":"Incidence, Epidemiology and Clinico-Pathological Status of Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in NICRH, Dhaka","authors":"A. Bhattacharjee, Afm Anwar Hossain, S. Yeasmin, T. Akter","doi":"10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Molecular subtype determination of breast carcinoma is still an enigma in our perspective. We are far behind the genetic analysis but immunohistochemistry is commonly ensured now a days.Objective: To observe the incidence, epidemiological and clinico-pathological status of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients.Materials and method: At first 141 patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. Among them 138 patients were finalized according to the eligibility criteria. A pre-structured, peer reviewed, properly tested, interview and observation based data collection sheet was prepared. Data regarding epidemiological profile, clinical profile and histopathological profile were collected, compiled, edited and analyzed. Mean, frequency, chi-square test were adopted for analysis. Statistics were found significant at 5cm sized tumour in maximum diameter. Among the five major molecular subtypes both luminal A and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed high prevalence (27.53%). Association of molecular subtypes with histopathological grading revealed TNBC was the most aggressive among all molecular subtypes. Axillary lymphadenopathy was present in almost all cases.Conclusion: Luminal A and TNBC were positive in most of the cases whereas TNBC showed higher association with advance histopathological grade. Clinical status was almost similar in all subtypes.Delta Med Col J. Jan 2018 6(1): 9-17","PeriodicalId":53280,"journal":{"name":"Delta Medical College Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35962","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Molecular subtype determination of breast carcinoma is still an enigma in our perspective. We are far behind the genetic analysis but immunohistochemistry is commonly ensured now a days.Objective: To observe the incidence, epidemiological and clinico-pathological status of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients.Materials and method: At first 141 patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. Among them 138 patients were finalized according to the eligibility criteria. A pre-structured, peer reviewed, properly tested, interview and observation based data collection sheet was prepared. Data regarding epidemiological profile, clinical profile and histopathological profile were collected, compiled, edited and analyzed. Mean, frequency, chi-square test were adopted for analysis. Statistics were found significant at 5cm sized tumour in maximum diameter. Among the five major molecular subtypes both luminal A and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed high prevalence (27.53%). Association of molecular subtypes with histopathological grading revealed TNBC was the most aggressive among all molecular subtypes. Axillary lymphadenopathy was present in almost all cases.Conclusion: Luminal A and TNBC were positive in most of the cases whereas TNBC showed higher association with advance histopathological grade. Clinical status was almost similar in all subtypes.Delta Med Col J. Jan 2018 6(1): 9-17
达卡NICRH不同分子亚型癌症的发病率、流行病学和临床病理状况
背景:在我们看来,乳腺癌分子亚型的确定仍然是一个谜。我们远远落后于基因分析,但免疫组织化学现在通常得到保证。目的:观察不同分子亚型乳腺癌患者的发病率、流行病学及临床病理状况。材料与方法:采用目的抽样法,纳入141例患者。其中138例患者根据入选标准最终确定。准备了一份预先结构化的、同行评审的、经过适当测试的、基于访谈和观察的数据收集表。收集流行病学资料、临床资料和组织病理学资料,进行整理、编辑和分析。采用均数、频率、卡方检验进行分析。在最大直径为5cm的肿瘤中,有统计学意义。在5种主要分子亚型中,腔内A和三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的患病率均较高(27.53%)。分子亚型与组织病理学分级的关联显示TNBC在所有分子亚型中最具侵袭性。几乎所有病例均有腋窝淋巴结病变。结论:绝大多数病例Luminal A和TNBC阳性,而TNBC与组织病理分级高相关。所有亚型的临床状况几乎相似。中华医学杂志,2018,6(1):9-17
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信