Automation Processes in the Port Industry and Union Strategies: The Case of Antwerp

IF 0.8 Q1 HISTORY
Andrea Bottalico
{"title":"Automation Processes in the Port Industry and Union Strategies: The Case of Antwerp","authors":"Andrea Bottalico","doi":"10.1515/ngs-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Automation represents a sensitive issue in the debate between social actors of the port-maritime industry. Automation produced a contraction of the number of dockworkers since the 1960s. However, the idea that technological innovation will produce the disappearance of work is not sustained by empirical evidence. For this reason, trade unions have been particularly watchful. Despite the discourses about robotization carried out by supply chain operators, the paradigm of the post-COVID logistics chain is still based upon the human labor cost. During the pandemic there has been a transformation in working conditions not in terms of replacing people with robots, but rather of the robotization of workers to obtain the maximum productive exploitation at the minimum wage allowed. The purpose of this article is to provide an analysis of labor relations and workers organizing in light of the automation processes in the European port of Antwerp. The article focuses on how working conditions and jobs are potentially impacted by automation in ports, and on how workers disruptive strategies are resisting to these dynamics. The following questions have been answered: How do trade unions and dockworkers respond to automation? What are the strategies implemented in the bargaining processes?","PeriodicalId":42013,"journal":{"name":"New Global Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"31 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Automation represents a sensitive issue in the debate between social actors of the port-maritime industry. Automation produced a contraction of the number of dockworkers since the 1960s. However, the idea that technological innovation will produce the disappearance of work is not sustained by empirical evidence. For this reason, trade unions have been particularly watchful. Despite the discourses about robotization carried out by supply chain operators, the paradigm of the post-COVID logistics chain is still based upon the human labor cost. During the pandemic there has been a transformation in working conditions not in terms of replacing people with robots, but rather of the robotization of workers to obtain the maximum productive exploitation at the minimum wage allowed. The purpose of this article is to provide an analysis of labor relations and workers organizing in light of the automation processes in the European port of Antwerp. The article focuses on how working conditions and jobs are potentially impacted by automation in ports, and on how workers disruptive strategies are resisting to these dynamics. The following questions have been answered: How do trade unions and dockworkers respond to automation? What are the strategies implemented in the bargaining processes?
港口业的自动化过程与联盟战略——以安特卫普为例
自动化是港口航运业社会行动者之间争论的一个敏感问题。自20世纪60年代以来,自动化导致码头工人数量减少。然而,技术创新将导致工作消失的观点并没有经验证据支持。出于这个原因,工会一直格外警惕。尽管供应链运营商进行了机器人化的论述,但后疫情物流链的范式仍然基于人力成本。在大流行期间,工作条件发生了变化,不是用机器人取代人,而是工人的机器人化,以便以允许的最低工资获得最大的生产剥削。本文的目的是提供劳动关系的分析和工人组织在安特卫普的自动化过程的光的欧洲港口。本文重点关注港口自动化对工作条件和工作的潜在影响,以及工人的破坏性策略如何抵制这些动态。以下问题得到了回答:工会和码头工人如何应对自动化?在议价过程中实施了哪些策略?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信