Average Volume-assured Pressure Support as Rescue Therapy after CPAP Failure in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Case Series Study.

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/18743064-v17-e230418-2022-18
Victor T Peng, Nauras Hwig, Anayansi Lasso-Pirot, Amal Isaiah, Montserrat Diaz-Abad
{"title":"Average Volume-assured Pressure Support as Rescue Therapy after CPAP Failure in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Case Series Study.","authors":"Victor T Peng,&nbsp;Nauras Hwig,&nbsp;Anayansi Lasso-Pirot,&nbsp;Amal Isaiah,&nbsp;Montserrat Diaz-Abad","doi":"10.2174/18743064-v17-e230418-2022-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is frequently prescribed for patients with residual obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) following adenotonsillectomy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal was to examine the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation with average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) as a potential option for children with failed CPAP titration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center retrospective study, we included children aged 1-17 years, with polysomnographically confirmed OSA who underwent AVAPS titration following failed CPAP titration. In addition to describing the clinical characteristics of the included patients, we compared polysomnographic parameters before and after AVAPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients met the inclusion criteria; out of them, 8 (89%) were males with an age range of 6.7 ± 3.9 years and a body mass index percentile of 81.0 ± 28.9. Reasons for failed CPAP titration were: 3 (33%) patients due to inability to control apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), 3 (33%) patients due to sleep-related hypoventilation, 2 (22%) patients due to treatment-emergent central sleep apnea, and 1 (11%) patient due to intolerance to CPAP. AVAPS resulted in a greater reduction in AHI than CPAP (reduction following CPAP = 24.6 ± 29.3, reduction following AVAPS = 42.5 ± 37.6, p = 0.008). All patients had resolution of the problems which caused CPAP failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this case a series of children with OSA and with failed CPAP titration, AVAPS resulted in a greater reduction in AHI compared with CPAP as well as resolution of the problems which caused CPAP failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"e187430642303080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/18743064-v17-e230418-2022-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is frequently prescribed for patients with residual obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) following adenotonsillectomy.

Objectives: The goal was to examine the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation with average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) as a potential option for children with failed CPAP titration.

Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, we included children aged 1-17 years, with polysomnographically confirmed OSA who underwent AVAPS titration following failed CPAP titration. In addition to describing the clinical characteristics of the included patients, we compared polysomnographic parameters before and after AVAPS.

Results: Nine patients met the inclusion criteria; out of them, 8 (89%) were males with an age range of 6.7 ± 3.9 years and a body mass index percentile of 81.0 ± 28.9. Reasons for failed CPAP titration were: 3 (33%) patients due to inability to control apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), 3 (33%) patients due to sleep-related hypoventilation, 2 (22%) patients due to treatment-emergent central sleep apnea, and 1 (11%) patient due to intolerance to CPAP. AVAPS resulted in a greater reduction in AHI than CPAP (reduction following CPAP = 24.6 ± 29.3, reduction following AVAPS = 42.5 ± 37.6, p = 0.008). All patients had resolution of the problems which caused CPAP failure.

Conclusion: In this case a series of children with OSA and with failed CPAP titration, AVAPS resulted in a greater reduction in AHI compared with CPAP as well as resolution of the problems which caused CPAP failure.

平均容量保证压力支持作为儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者CPAP失败后的抢救治疗:回顾性病例系列研究
持续气道正压通气(CPAP)常用于腺扁桃体切除术后残余阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者。目的是检查无创通气与平均容量保证压力支持(AVAPS)作为CPAP滴定失败儿童的潜在选择的有效性。在一项单中心回顾性研究中,我们纳入了1-17岁的儿童,多导睡眠图证实OSA,在CPAP滴定失败后接受AVAPS滴定。除了描述纳入患者的临床特征外,我们还比较了AVAPS前后的多导睡眠图参数。9例患者符合纳入标准;其中男性8例(89%),年龄6.7±3.9岁,体重指数为81.0±28.9。CPAP滴定失败的原因有:3例(33%)患者由于无法控制呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI), 3例(33%)患者由于睡眠相关性低通气,2例(22%)患者由于治疗后出现的中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停,1例(11%)患者由于CPAP不耐受。AVAPS的AHI降低幅度大于CPAP (CPAP后降低= 24.6±29.3,AVAPS后降低= 42.5±37.6,p = 0.008)。所有患者均解决了导致CPAP失败的问题。在本病例中,一系列患有OSA且CPAP滴定失败的儿童,与CPAP相比,AVAPS导致AHI更大的降低,并解决了导致CPAP失败的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信