Individual-, Community-, and Health System–Level Barriers to Optimal Type 2 Diabetes Care for Inner-City African Americans: An Integrative Review and Model Development

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions
J. Campbell, L. Egede
{"title":"Individual-, Community-, and Health System–Level Barriers to Optimal Type 2 Diabetes Care for Inner-City African Americans: An Integrative Review and Model Development","authors":"J. Campbell, L. Egede","doi":"10.1177/0145721719889338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this integrative review is (1) to elucidate the unique barriers faced by inner-city African Americans for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) care; (2) to identify effective interventions/programs for optimal T2DM care at the individual, community, and health systems levels; and (3) to integrate 2 behavioral models and 1 social ecological model for framing interventions for inner-city African American to optimize T2DM care. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed to systematically search PubMed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL. Integration of models was based on underlying principles of social ecological models. Results The search returned 1183 articles. Forty-six articles were synthesized after applying inclusion criteria. Multiple barriers for the individual level, community level, and health system level were identified. Major barriers include lack of knowledge, lack of social support, and self-management support. Interventions identified in this review show that among inner-city African Americans with T2DM, the focus is placed at the health systems level, with very limited focus toward addressing individual- and community-level barriers. Final synthesis includes development of a new integrated model that explains barriers to care across multiple levels. Conclusions These findings highlight the fragmentation that may be occurring between policy, research, and practice for achieving health equity and addressing health disparities for T2DM care among inner-city African Americans. The new model is an important step in the pursuit of equity in T2DM by specifying the complex barriers that occur across multiple levels. The application of this model using the 2017 National Standards for Diabetes–Self Management Education and Support are discussed.","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721719889338","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719889338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this integrative review is (1) to elucidate the unique barriers faced by inner-city African Americans for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) care; (2) to identify effective interventions/programs for optimal T2DM care at the individual, community, and health systems levels; and (3) to integrate 2 behavioral models and 1 social ecological model for framing interventions for inner-city African American to optimize T2DM care. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed to systematically search PubMed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL. Integration of models was based on underlying principles of social ecological models. Results The search returned 1183 articles. Forty-six articles were synthesized after applying inclusion criteria. Multiple barriers for the individual level, community level, and health system level were identified. Major barriers include lack of knowledge, lack of social support, and self-management support. Interventions identified in this review show that among inner-city African Americans with T2DM, the focus is placed at the health systems level, with very limited focus toward addressing individual- and community-level barriers. Final synthesis includes development of a new integrated model that explains barriers to care across multiple levels. Conclusions These findings highlight the fragmentation that may be occurring between policy, research, and practice for achieving health equity and addressing health disparities for T2DM care among inner-city African Americans. The new model is an important step in the pursuit of equity in T2DM by specifying the complex barriers that occur across multiple levels. The application of this model using the 2017 National Standards for Diabetes–Self Management Education and Support are discussed.
内城非裔美国人获得最佳2型糖尿病护理的个人、社区和卫生系统层面的障碍:综合回顾和模型开发
目的本综合综述的目的是(1)阐明市中心非裔美国人在2型糖尿病(T2DM)护理方面面临的独特障碍;(2) 在个人、社区和卫生系统层面确定有效的干预措施/计划,以实现T2DM的最佳护理;(3)整合2个行为模型和1个社会生态模型,为市中心非裔美国人制定干预措施,以优化T2DM护理。方法遵循PRISMA指南,系统检索PubMed、PsychInfo和CINAHL。模型的整合是基于社会生态模型的基本原则。结果搜索返回1183篇文章。在应用纳入标准后,共合成了46篇文章。确定了个人层面、社区层面和卫生系统层面的多重障碍。主要障碍包括缺乏知识、缺乏社会支持和自我管理支持。本综述中确定的干预措施表明,在患有2型糖尿病的内城非裔美国人中,重点放在卫生系统层面,对解决个人和社区层面的障碍的关注非常有限。最终综合包括开发一个新的综合模型,解释多个层面的护理障碍。结论这些发现突出了在实现健康公平和解决城市内非裔美国人T2DM护理健康差异的政策、研究和实践之间可能存在的碎片化。新模型通过指定跨多个层面出现的复杂障碍,是追求T2DM公平的重要一步。使用2017年《糖尿病国家标准——自我管理教育和支持》讨论了该模型的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信