Role of public in protection and use of wildlife: problems and solutions. Russian federation, Trans-Baikal territory, Republic of Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan
{"title":"Role of public in protection and use of wildlife: problems and solutions. Russian federation, Trans-Baikal territory, Republic of Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan","authors":"S. Ivanova","doi":"10.56398/ajacieda.00173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the principles and criteria of public participation in\nsolving issues in the field of protection and use of wildlife. Interaction\nbetween the authorities and the public should be built on a fair, effective and\ninformative basis. The author states that public participation in general can be\nregarded as providing people with an opportunity to influence the results of\nthe plans and work processes that constitute the activities of government\nbodies.\nBased on the analysis of certain provisions of the legislation on the animal\nworld and law enforcement practice, the author comes to the conclusion that\nthe legal framework for the citizens participation in the management of the\nprotection and sustainable use of wildlife in Russia is quite extensive.\nHowever, the subsequent provisions of the law did not reflect the specific\nforms and mechanisms of such participation. The rules for public\nparticipation and access to information in the field of wildlife management\nremain unsatisfactory, since these problems are simply addressed in a limited\nnumber of cases. The relevant rules are developed in excessively general terms\nand without detailed procedures that must be followed to ensure their full\nimplementation. The author suggests specific problem-solving options to\ndraw the public attention to the management issues in the protection and use\nof wildlife.","PeriodicalId":53916,"journal":{"name":"Actualidad Juridica Ambiental","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actualidad Juridica Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article examines the principles and criteria of public participation in
solving issues in the field of protection and use of wildlife. Interaction
between the authorities and the public should be built on a fair, effective and
informative basis. The author states that public participation in general can be
regarded as providing people with an opportunity to influence the results of
the plans and work processes that constitute the activities of government
bodies.
Based on the analysis of certain provisions of the legislation on the animal
world and law enforcement practice, the author comes to the conclusion that
the legal framework for the citizens participation in the management of the
protection and sustainable use of wildlife in Russia is quite extensive.
However, the subsequent provisions of the law did not reflect the specific
forms and mechanisms of such participation. The rules for public
participation and access to information in the field of wildlife management
remain unsatisfactory, since these problems are simply addressed in a limited
number of cases. The relevant rules are developed in excessively general terms
and without detailed procedures that must be followed to ensure their full
implementation. The author suggests specific problem-solving options to
draw the public attention to the management issues in the protection and use
of wildlife.