{"title":"Някои типове съществителни имена в българския език с оглед на формалното им описание","authors":"Илияна [Iliiana] Кунева [Kuneva]","doi":"10.11649/SM.1660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some types of nouns in Bulgarian in view of their formal description This article presents a part of the formal description of nouns in Bulgarian made for the purposes of the Normative grammar of modern Bulgarian. It reviews the descriptive approach that has been adopted and some issues that can be solved through its implementation. In particular, cases of variation of forms within the paradigm of the nouns as well as types of nouns with “defective” paradigm are discussed. Niektóre typy rzeczowników w języku bułgarskim ze względu na ich opis formalny W artykule przedstawiono część formalnego opisu rzeczowników w języku bułgarskim. Opis został sporządzony na potrzeby Gramatyki normatywnej współczesnego języka bułgarskiego. Zaprezentowano przyjęte kryteria opisu oraz ich zastosowanie na wybranych przykładach. W szczególności omówiono przypadki wariancji form wewnątrz paradygmatu rzeczownikowego i przeanalizowano typy rzeczowników o „wadliwym” paradygmacie.","PeriodicalId":40289,"journal":{"name":"Slavia Meridionalis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavia Meridionalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11649/SM.1660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Some types of nouns in Bulgarian in view of their formal description This article presents a part of the formal description of nouns in Bulgarian made for the purposes of the Normative grammar of modern Bulgarian. It reviews the descriptive approach that has been adopted and some issues that can be solved through its implementation. In particular, cases of variation of forms within the paradigm of the nouns as well as types of nouns with “defective” paradigm are discussed. Niektóre typy rzeczowników w języku bułgarskim ze względu na ich opis formalny W artykule przedstawiono część formalnego opisu rzeczowników w języku bułgarskim. Opis został sporządzony na potrzeby Gramatyki normatywnej współczesnego języka bułgarskiego. Zaprezentowano przyjęte kryteria opisu oraz ich zastosowanie na wybranych przykładach. W szczególności omówiono przypadki wariancji form wewnątrz paradygmatu rzeczownikowego i przeanalizowano typy rzeczowników o „wadliwym” paradygmacie.
期刊介绍:
“Slavia Meridionalis” is an interdisciplinary journal publishing papers on literature, culture, history, ethnology and languages of southern Slavic countries, as well as their dynamic interactions with other regions. Each issue contains articles concerning a specific, pre-defined topic, which enables scholars of various disciplines (historians, literature and culture experts, linguists, sociologists, and anthropologists) to present in-depth analyses of their research questions. Our journal publishes papers written by distinguished Polish and foreign scholars, as well as young researchers – papers are published as long as they are of high scientific value. “Slavia Meridionalis” invites articles written in English, German, French, Spanish and Russian, but also in all Slavic languages, which ensures that papers reach various academic circles. Every paper in “Slavia Meridionalis” includes an abstract in Polish and English, as well as keywords. Apart from papers, our journal contains two other sections: reviews of important books in Slavic studies, and biographical notes on authors important for the field. We ensure the highest quality of our papers through a three-stage reviewing process: first, an article is reviewed by the members of the Editorial Board; subsequently, it must pass blind peer review; finally, it must be accepted by the evaluator responsible for a given issue.