Perspectivas múltiples del conflicto paramilitar en dos novelas colombianas recientes: Viaje al interior de una gota de Sangre (2011) de Daniel Ferreira y El espantapájaros de Ricardo Silva Romero (2012)
{"title":"Perspectivas múltiples del conflicto paramilitar en dos novelas colombianas recientes: Viaje al interior de una gota de Sangre (2011) de Daniel Ferreira y El espantapájaros de Ricardo Silva Romero (2012)","authors":"I. Urgelles, Danilo Santos","doi":"10.5195/ct/2020.486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we explore the paramilitary representation as a form of narrative violence of the so-called Internal Armed Conflict in Colombia in two XXI century novels: Viaje al interior de una gota de Sangre (2011) by Daniel Ferreira and El espantapajaros by Ricardo Silva Romero (2012). Both texts tell about the massacre of peoples, with the indiscriminate extermination of men, women, children and elderly men and women. The stories are articulated from multiple perspectives, which include both the victims and the murderers as enunciators. This swarm of voices establishes a connection with the massacre as an experience of collective extermination in which perspectivism allows for the inclusion of victimizing masculinities, particularly the paramilitary group. This article seeks to highlight the ‘literarized” element from multiperspectivism by which these Colombian novelists face the disaster of the massacre, providing an implicit reading of ideological evaluation to the saturated explicitness of the literary procedure.","PeriodicalId":40660,"journal":{"name":"Catedral Tomada-Revista de Critica Literaria Latinoamericana-Journal of Latin American Literary Criticism","volume":"8 1","pages":"121-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catedral Tomada-Revista de Critica Literaria Latinoamericana-Journal of Latin American Literary Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ct/2020.486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article we explore the paramilitary representation as a form of narrative violence of the so-called Internal Armed Conflict in Colombia in two XXI century novels: Viaje al interior de una gota de Sangre (2011) by Daniel Ferreira and El espantapajaros by Ricardo Silva Romero (2012). Both texts tell about the massacre of peoples, with the indiscriminate extermination of men, women, children and elderly men and women. The stories are articulated from multiple perspectives, which include both the victims and the murderers as enunciators. This swarm of voices establishes a connection with the massacre as an experience of collective extermination in which perspectivism allows for the inclusion of victimizing masculinities, particularly the paramilitary group. This article seeks to highlight the ‘literarized” element from multiperspectivism by which these Colombian novelists face the disaster of the massacre, providing an implicit reading of ideological evaluation to the saturated explicitness of the literary procedure.
在这篇文章中,我们探讨了两部21世纪小说中所谓的哥伦比亚内部武装冲突的准军事表现形式:丹尼尔·费雷拉的《Viaje al-Internal de una gota de Sangre》(2011)和里卡多·席尔瓦·罗梅罗的《El espantapajaros》(2012)。这两个文本都讲述了对人民的屠杀,不分青红皂白地灭绝男人、女人、儿童和老人。这些故事从多个角度阐述,其中包括受害者和凶手。这群声音与大屠杀建立了联系,认为大屠杀是一种集体灭绝的经历,在这种经历中,透视主义允许包括受害的男性,特别是准军事团体。本文试图从多视角突出这些哥伦比亚小说家面对大屠杀灾难的“文学化”元素,为文学程序的饱和显性提供一种意识形态评价的隐含解读。