No Envy

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI:10.23941/EJPE.V14I1.610

Conrad Heilmann, Stefan Wintein

引用次数: 2

Abstract

The important ‘no-envy’ fairness criterion has typically been attributed to Foley (1967) and sometimes to Tinbergen (1946, 1953). We reveal that Jan Tinbergen introduced ‘no-envy’ as a fairness criterion in his article “Mathematiese Psychologie” published in 1930 in the Dutch journal Mens en Maatschappij and translated as “Mathematical Psychology” in 2021 in the Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics. Our article accompanies the translation: we introduce Tinbergen’s 1930 formulation of the ‘no-envy’ criterion, compare it to other formulations, and comment on its significance for the fairness literature in philosophy and economics.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不嫉妒

重要的“不嫉妒”公平标准通常被认为是Foley(1967)提出的，有时也被认为是Tinbergen(1946, 1953)提出的。我们发现，Jan Tinbergen在1930年发表于荷兰期刊《Mens en Maatschappij》的文章《数学心理学》(Mathematiese Psychologie)中引入了“不嫉妒”作为公平标准，并于2021年在《伊拉斯谟哲学与经济学期刊》上被翻译为“数学心理学”。本文介绍了丁伯根(Tinbergen)在1930年提出的“不嫉妒”标准，并将其与其他标准进行了比较，并评论了其对哲学和经济学公平文献的意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics (EJPE) is a peer-reviewed bi-annual academic journal supported by the Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics at the Erasmus School of Philosophy of Erasmus University Rotterdam. EJPE publishes research on the methodology, history, ethics, and interdisciplinary relations of economics, and welcomes contributions from all scholars with an interest in any of its research domains. EJPE is an Open Access Journal: all the content is permanently available online without subscription or payment. EJPE aims to... -Publish high quality original research on the intersection of philosophy and economics. -Support the inter-disciplinary development of the field with critical survey papers covering ongoing debates and information about relevant publications. -Provide a forum that is friendly to young scholars, and supported by an authoritative, efficient, and constructive review process.