Images & Color: The Strasbourg Printer Johann Schott (1477–1548) and His Circle

IF 0.5 2区哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Early Science and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.1163/15733823-20220060

Domenico Bertoloni Meli

引用次数: 0

Abstract

While most Renaissance scholars working on compendia of learning, geography, surgery, legal history, art history, the Reformation, and botany will be familiar with the name of Johann Schott, few have appreciated the range and impact of the Strasbourg printer’s publications. Here I discuss a handful among the over two hundred books and other materials he printed: Gregor Reisch’s Margarita Philosophica; the edition of Ptolemy’s Geographia with Waldseemüller’s maps; Hans von Gersdorff, Feldtbuch der Wundarzney; and – the main focus this essay – Herbarum vivae eicones, with figures by Hans Weiditz and text by Otto Brunfels. Schott can be seen as an architect or active agent of his publications; his innovative use of images and color can be seen as having progressively developed from his early prints to his celebrated herbal.

查看原文本刊更多论文

图片和颜色:斯特拉斯堡印刷约翰·肖特(1477-1548)和他的圈子

虽然大多数从事学术概要、地理、外科、法律史、艺术史、宗教改革和植物学研究的文艺复兴学者都熟悉约翰·肖特的名字，但很少有人了解斯特拉斯堡印刷商出版物的范围和影响。在这里，我讨论他出版的两百多本书和其他材料中的一小部分:格雷戈尔·赖希的《玛格丽塔哲学》;托勒密的《地理学》，配以瓦尔德塞姆·勒的地图;汉斯·冯·格斯多夫，《魔达兹尼》;这篇文章的主要焦点是《活植物标本馆》(Herbarum vivae eicones)，由汉斯·魏迪茨(Hans Weiditz)绘制图形，奥托·布伦费尔斯(Otto Brunfels)撰写文本。肖特可以被看作是一个建筑师或他的出版物的积极代理人;他对图像和色彩的创新使用可以看作是从他早期的版画到他著名的草药画逐渐发展起来的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Early Science and Medicine HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Early Science and Medicine (ESM) is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to the history of science, medicine and technology from the earliest times through to the end of the eighteenth century. The need to treat in a single journal all aspects of scientific activity and thought to the eighteenth century is due to two factors: to the continued importance of ancient sources throughout the Middle Ages and the early modern period, and to the comparably low degree of specialization and the high degree of disciplinary interdependence characterizing the period before the professionalization of science.