Transforming Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions and Lesson Plan Designs for Teaching Mathematics from a Direct-Teaching Approach to a Reform-Based Approach

Q2 Mathematics
Ozgul Kartal, W. Tillett
{"title":"Transforming Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions and Lesson Plan Designs for Teaching Mathematics from a Direct-Teaching Approach to a Reform-Based Approach","authors":"Ozgul Kartal, W. Tillett","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated preservice teachers’ (PTs) conceptions of how math is well-taught, their ability to design lessons that employ reform-based practices, and relations between their conceptions and lesson plans. We developed a survey and a rubric, in relation to the most recent standards and practices in U.S for the teaching and learning of math, to measure conceptions of how math is well-taught, and to measure the quality of a lesson plan. We designed and implemented a series of activities based on most recent reform-based standards and practices in a math methods course. The results showed significant change in PTs’ (n = 68) conceptions, however, there was not any significant relationship between their conceptions and their capability of designing reform-based lesson plans. While significant change occurred both in PTs’ conceptions and lesson-planning styles, the scores indicated that they were not yet fully convinced, nor fully capable. Suggestions and implications for teacher educators are discussed.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"107 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated preservice teachers’ (PTs) conceptions of how math is well-taught, their ability to design lessons that employ reform-based practices, and relations between their conceptions and lesson plans. We developed a survey and a rubric, in relation to the most recent standards and practices in U.S for the teaching and learning of math, to measure conceptions of how math is well-taught, and to measure the quality of a lesson plan. We designed and implemented a series of activities based on most recent reform-based standards and practices in a math methods course. The results showed significant change in PTs’ (n = 68) conceptions, however, there was not any significant relationship between their conceptions and their capability of designing reform-based lesson plans. While significant change occurred both in PTs’ conceptions and lesson-planning styles, the scores indicated that they were not yet fully convinced, nor fully capable. Suggestions and implications for teacher educators are discussed.
职前教师数学教学观念与教案设计从直接教学向改革教学转变
摘要本研究调查了职前教师(PTs)对如何教好数学的概念,他们设计采用基于改革的实践的课程的能力,以及他们的概念和课程计划之间的关系。我们根据美国数学教学的最新标准和实践,制定了一项调查和一个标准,以衡量如何教好数学的概念,并衡量课程计划的质量。在数学方法课程中,我们根据最新的改革标准和实践设计并实施了一系列活动。结果显示,学生(n = 68)的观念发生了显著变化,但他们的观念与设计改革教案的能力之间没有显著的关系。虽然学生的观念和课程规划风格都发生了重大变化,但分数表明他们还没有完全相信,也没有完全有能力。讨论了对教师教育工作者的建议和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信