Reactivity of 9-anilinoacridine derivatives as potent anticancer agents: A DFT approach

Pubalee Sarmah, R. Deka
{"title":"Reactivity of 9-anilinoacridine derivatives as potent anticancer agents: A DFT approach","authors":"Pubalee Sarmah, R. Deka","doi":"10.2174/1877946812666220518144815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAnticancer activity of 9-anilinoacridine derivatives has been well reported. Although the DNA-drug sequence-specific binding of these compounds may be affected by the substituent(s) on the aniline ring, it is still unclear which substituent (NH2 or CH2–OH) on the anilino ring of the compound is the critical element. A good understanding of chemical properties such as steric, lipophilic and electronic properties at the molecular level may provide important background of mutagenic and carcinogenic properties.\n\n\n\nThe present study is an attempt to understand the reactive nature of some selected 9-anilinoacridine derivatives in both gas and solvent phases and to predict their anticancer activity by QSAR analysis.\n\n\n\nFull geometry optimizations of all derivatives were carried out at gradient corrected DFT using DMol3 program. We used DNP basis set in combination with BLYP to study all the derivatives. The molecular mechanics parameters used for QSAR analysis were calculated using Hyperchem software.\n\n\n\nWe found Compound 31 (R=COOC6H5) as the most stable compound and compound 6 (R1= NO2) as the most reactive one in both gas and solvent phases. Fukui function (f+) values of all the atoms showed that N10 is the most reactive atom in each of the molecule which indicates that N10 is the preferred site for nucleophilic attack. The final QSAR model with four parameters (electrophilicity, hardness, surface area and molar refractivity) is capable of predicting anticancer activity of the compounds against leukemic HL-60 cell lines with r2=\n0.91 and 0.88 in both gas and solvent phases, respectively.\n\n\n\nThe global and local reactivity descriptors, such as hardness, chemical potential, electrophilicity index, Fukui function, and local philicity were calculated for understanding the reactive nature and reactive sites of the compounds. The comparative QSAR study with the help of DFT and MM + techniques provides the importance of the selected descriptors in predicting activity of the selected derivatives.\n","PeriodicalId":89671,"journal":{"name":"Current physical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current physical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1877946812666220518144815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticancer activity of 9-anilinoacridine derivatives has been well reported. Although the DNA-drug sequence-specific binding of these compounds may be affected by the substituent(s) on the aniline ring, it is still unclear which substituent (NH2 or CH2–OH) on the anilino ring of the compound is the critical element. A good understanding of chemical properties such as steric, lipophilic and electronic properties at the molecular level may provide important background of mutagenic and carcinogenic properties. The present study is an attempt to understand the reactive nature of some selected 9-anilinoacridine derivatives in both gas and solvent phases and to predict their anticancer activity by QSAR analysis. Full geometry optimizations of all derivatives were carried out at gradient corrected DFT using DMol3 program. We used DNP basis set in combination with BLYP to study all the derivatives. The molecular mechanics parameters used for QSAR analysis were calculated using Hyperchem software. We found Compound 31 (R=COOC6H5) as the most stable compound and compound 6 (R1= NO2) as the most reactive one in both gas and solvent phases. Fukui function (f+) values of all the atoms showed that N10 is the most reactive atom in each of the molecule which indicates that N10 is the preferred site for nucleophilic attack. The final QSAR model with four parameters (electrophilicity, hardness, surface area and molar refractivity) is capable of predicting anticancer activity of the compounds against leukemic HL-60 cell lines with r2= 0.91 and 0.88 in both gas and solvent phases, respectively. The global and local reactivity descriptors, such as hardness, chemical potential, electrophilicity index, Fukui function, and local philicity were calculated for understanding the reactive nature and reactive sites of the compounds. The comparative QSAR study with the help of DFT and MM + techniques provides the importance of the selected descriptors in predicting activity of the selected derivatives.
9-苯胺基吖啶衍生物作为强效抗癌剂的反应性:DFT方法
9-苯胺基吖啶衍生物的抗癌活性已被广泛报道。尽管这些化合物的DNA药物序列特异性结合可能受到苯胺环上取代基的影响,但仍不清楚化合物苯胺环上的哪个取代基(NH2或CH2–OH)是关键元素。在分子水平上很好地理解化学性质,如空间、亲脂性和电子性质,可以提供诱变和致癌性质的重要背景。本研究试图了解一些选定的9-苯胺基吖啶衍生物在气相和溶剂相中的反应性质,并通过QSAR分析预测其抗癌活性。使用DMol3程序在梯度校正DFT下对所有导数进行全几何优化。我们将DNP基集与BLYP相结合来研究所有的导数。使用Hyperchem软件计算用于QSAR分析的分子力学参数。我们发现化合物31(R=COOC6H5)是在气相和溶剂相中最稳定的化合物,化合物6(R1=NO2)是最具反应性的化合物。所有原子的Fukui函数(f+)值表明,N10是每个分子中反应性最强的原子,这表明N10是亲核攻击的优选位点。具有四个参数(亲电性、硬度、表面积和摩尔折射率)的最终QSAR模型能够预测化合物在气相和溶剂相中对白血病HL-60细胞系的抗癌活性,r2=0.91和0.88。计算了全局和局部反应描述符,如硬度、化学势、亲电指数、福井函数和局部亲电性,以了解化合物的反应性质和反应位点。在DFT和MM+技术的帮助下进行的QSAR比较研究提供了所选描述符在预测所选衍生物的活性方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信