A comparative study of postoperative airway management between traditional nasal packing and modified nasal airway after nasal surgeries

Muhammad Saleem, Baber Rafiq Khan, Sarwat Bibi, Humaira Ahmad, Muhammad Hamza Rana
{"title":"A comparative study of postoperative airway management between traditional nasal packing and modified nasal airway after nasal surgeries","authors":"Muhammad Saleem, Baber Rafiq Khan, Sarwat Bibi, Humaira Ahmad, Muhammad Hamza Rana","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v13i1.659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: One of the most common challenging complications after nasal surgeries is maintaining airways. The study aimed to use an alternative technique instead of nasal packing in the immediate postoperative period undergoing different nasal surgery under general anesthesia regarding airway management. \nMETHODOLOGY: An interventional study was conducted at Aziz Fatimah Trust Hospital, Faisalabad, from  March 20, 2018, to January 31, 2019. A total of 100 participants were enrolled in the study divided into two groups (A & B), 50 each. Group A patients were treated postoperatively with a modified nasal airway devised with a Nelton catheter and Group B patients with traditional nasal packing. The participants were assessed on different parameters which were statistically compared and analyzed. \nRESULTS: Group Descriptive statistics revealed that the Mean±SD of the age of group A and group B patients was 24.28±9.72 and 26.68±11.09 respectively, which had no significant difference between them {p-value (0.008)}. The postoperative parameters such as patient's comfort and sleep, surgeon satisfaction, ease of suction through Nelton catheter, and oxygen saturation were evaluated as significant variables in the evaluation of the study. p-value ≤0.05 and ≤0.005 were considered as significant and highly significant respectively. \nCONCLUSION: This modified nasal airway has proven to be easily replicable and reliable, and a cost-effective measure elucidated as a potential and exclusive outcome of the present study.","PeriodicalId":33713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical Dental College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v13i1.659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: One of the most common challenging complications after nasal surgeries is maintaining airways. The study aimed to use an alternative technique instead of nasal packing in the immediate postoperative period undergoing different nasal surgery under general anesthesia regarding airway management. METHODOLOGY: An interventional study was conducted at Aziz Fatimah Trust Hospital, Faisalabad, from  March 20, 2018, to January 31, 2019. A total of 100 participants were enrolled in the study divided into two groups (A & B), 50 each. Group A patients were treated postoperatively with a modified nasal airway devised with a Nelton catheter and Group B patients with traditional nasal packing. The participants were assessed on different parameters which were statistically compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Group Descriptive statistics revealed that the Mean±SD of the age of group A and group B patients was 24.28±9.72 and 26.68±11.09 respectively, which had no significant difference between them {p-value (0.008)}. The postoperative parameters such as patient's comfort and sleep, surgeon satisfaction, ease of suction through Nelton catheter, and oxygen saturation were evaluated as significant variables in the evaluation of the study. p-value ≤0.05 and ≤0.005 were considered as significant and highly significant respectively. CONCLUSION: This modified nasal airway has proven to be easily replicable and reliable, and a cost-effective measure elucidated as a potential and exclusive outcome of the present study.
传统鼻填塞与改良鼻气道术后气道管理的比较研究
背景与目的:鼻腔手术后最常见的并发症之一是气道的维持。本研究的目的是在全身麻醉下进行不同鼻部手术后立即使用一种替代鼻塞的技术来处理气道管理。方法:于2018年3月20日至2019年1月31日在费萨拉巴德Aziz Fatimah信托医院进行了一项介入性研究。共有100名参与者参加了这项研究,分为两组(A和B),每组50人。A组患者术后采用改良鼻道导气管,B组患者术后采用传统鼻填充物。对参与者进行不同参数的评估,并进行统计比较和分析。结果:组描述性统计显示,A组和B组患者年龄均值±SD分别为24.28±9.72和26.68±11.09,两组间差异无统计学意义{p值(0.008)}。术后参数如患者的舒适度和睡眠、外科医生的满意度、通过Nelton导管吸引的难易程度、血氧饱和度作为评价研究的重要变量。p值≤0.05为显著,p值≤0.005为极显著。结论:这种改良的鼻导气管已被证明是易于复制和可靠的,并且是一种具有成本效益的措施,是本研究的潜在和唯一的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信