Randomized clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction between zirconia crowns and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars: A 24 month follow up

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Pediatric Dental Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pdj.2023.07.002

Vrushali Patil, Shilpa S. Naik, Sanjana R. Kodical, Rucha Bhise Patil, Shreya Khodke, Kiran Ghule

{"title":"Randomized clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction between zirconia crowns and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars: A 24 month follow up","authors":"Vrushali Patil, Shilpa S. Naik, Sanjana R. Kodical, Rucha Bhise Patil, Shreya Khodke, Kiran Ghule","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the clinical success and parental satisfaction of zirconia<span> crowns (Kids-e-crowns™) with preformed stainless-steel crowns (3M™ ESPE) in the restoration of primary first and second molars.</span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed as a split-mouth study. 100 teeth in 47 children aged between 3 and 7 years were selected and randomly assigned in two groups, each group containing 50 teeth. Restorations were evaluated at 24 h, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months recall appointments examining the following criteria-restoration failure, marginal integrity, gingival health, plaque accumulation, occlusion, opposing tooth wear and parental satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The performance of both the groups was comparable in terms of restoration failure, marginal integrity, gingival health, occlusion, opposing tooth wear. However, plaque accumulation was significantly higher in stainless-steel crowns than zirconia crowns.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Two year follow-up indicated that preformed zirconia crowns are an excellent aesthetic alternative to stainless-steel crowns as full coronal restorations in the paediatric population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239423000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and aim

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical success and parental satisfaction of zirconia crowns (Kids-e-crowns™) with preformed stainless-steel crowns (3M™ ESPE) in the restoration of primary first and second molars.

Materials and methods

This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed as a split-mouth study. 100 teeth in 47 children aged between 3 and 7 years were selected and randomly assigned in two groups, each group containing 50 teeth. Restorations were evaluated at 24 h, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months recall appointments examining the following criteria-restoration failure, marginal integrity, gingival health, plaque accumulation, occlusion, opposing tooth wear and parental satisfaction.

Results

The performance of both the groups was comparable in terms of restoration failure, marginal integrity, gingival health, occlusion, opposing tooth wear. However, plaque accumulation was significantly higher in stainless-steel crowns than zirconia crowns.

Conclusion

Two year follow-up indicated that preformed zirconia crowns are an excellent aesthetic alternative to stainless-steel crowns as full coronal restorations in the paediatric population.

查看原文本刊更多论文

氧化锆冠与不锈钢冠在初生磨牙上的随机临床评价及家长满意度:24个月随访

导言和目的本研究旨在比较氧化锆牙冠（Kids-e-crowns™）和预制不锈钢牙冠（3M™ ESPE）在修复初级第一和第二磨牙时的临床成功率和家长满意度。研究人员从 47 名 3 至 7 岁儿童的 100 颗牙齿中选取 100 颗牙齿，随机分配到两组，每组 50 颗牙齿。分别在 24 小时、3、6、12 和 24 个月的复诊时对修复体进行评估，检查标准包括修复失败、边缘完整性、牙龈健康、菌斑累积、咬合、对牙磨损和家长满意度。结论两年的随访表明，在儿科人群中，作为全冠修复体，预成型氧化锆冠是不锈钢冠的极佳美学替代物。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊