Association of the microbial culture of follicular fluid, vaginal swab and catheter tip with β–hCG IVF positive and negative

IF 0.5 Q4 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Manoj Chellani, Manju Chellani, S. Rahangdale
{"title":"Association of the microbial culture of follicular fluid, vaginal swab and catheter tip with β–hCG IVF positive and negative","authors":"Manoj Chellani, Manju Chellani, S. Rahangdale","doi":"10.4103/2305-0500.356840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To find out the association of microbial contamination with β-human chorionic gonadotropin ( β-hCG) in-vitro fertilization (IVF) positive and negative. Methods: A total of 73 fresh IVF cycle women were included in the retrospective study. Vaginal swab culture samples were collected prior to ovum pick-up and embryo transfer. The follicular fluids were collected during ovum pick-up and catheter tip culture samples were collected after successful embryo transfer. After 14 days of the embryo transfer, women were classified into β-hCG IVF positive and negative. The comparative statistical analyses of aerobic microbial culture reports were done between β-hCG IVF positive and negative women. Results: Out of 73 women, 42(57.5%) were found to be β-hCG IVF positive and 31(43.5%) were negative. In the aerobic culture of ovum pick-up vaginal swab, follicular fluid, embryo transplantation vaginal swab and catheter tip, Enterococcus faecalis was found to be higher compared to other bacteria (Streptococcus spp., Candida, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella). Regarding the comparison between IVF positive and negative, the overall microbial infection rate of vaginal swab culture during ovum pick-up and embryo transplantation was found to be higher in IVF negative women than in IVF positive women (38.71% vs. 28.57%); however, it was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The follicular fluid and catheter tip culture microbial infection rate was found to slightly higher in IVF positive women than in IVF negative women (54.76% vs. 41.94% and 19.05% vs. 9.68%, respectively), but there were not significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusions: The aerobic microbial culture reports of follicular fluid, vaginal swab culture, and catheter tip culture are not statistically significantly with β-hCG IVF positive.","PeriodicalId":8564,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction","volume":"11 1","pages":"217 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2305-0500.356840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To find out the association of microbial contamination with β-human chorionic gonadotropin ( β-hCG) in-vitro fertilization (IVF) positive and negative. Methods: A total of 73 fresh IVF cycle women were included in the retrospective study. Vaginal swab culture samples were collected prior to ovum pick-up and embryo transfer. The follicular fluids were collected during ovum pick-up and catheter tip culture samples were collected after successful embryo transfer. After 14 days of the embryo transfer, women were classified into β-hCG IVF positive and negative. The comparative statistical analyses of aerobic microbial culture reports were done between β-hCG IVF positive and negative women. Results: Out of 73 women, 42(57.5%) were found to be β-hCG IVF positive and 31(43.5%) were negative. In the aerobic culture of ovum pick-up vaginal swab, follicular fluid, embryo transplantation vaginal swab and catheter tip, Enterococcus faecalis was found to be higher compared to other bacteria (Streptococcus spp., Candida, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella). Regarding the comparison between IVF positive and negative, the overall microbial infection rate of vaginal swab culture during ovum pick-up and embryo transplantation was found to be higher in IVF negative women than in IVF positive women (38.71% vs. 28.57%); however, it was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The follicular fluid and catheter tip culture microbial infection rate was found to slightly higher in IVF positive women than in IVF negative women (54.76% vs. 41.94% and 19.05% vs. 9.68%, respectively), but there were not significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusions: The aerobic microbial culture reports of follicular fluid, vaginal swab culture, and catheter tip culture are not statistically significantly with β-hCG IVF positive.
卵泡液、阴道拭子和导管尖端微生物培养与体外受精β-hCG阳性和阴性的关系
目的:探讨微生物污染与体外受精(IVF)中β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)阳性和阴性的关系。方法:对73例新鲜IVF周期妇女进行回顾性研究。在取卵和胚胎移植前收集阴道拭子培养样本。取卵时采集卵泡液,胚胎移植成功后采集导管尖端培养标本。胚胎移植14天后,将女性分为体外受精(IVF)阳性和阴性。对体外受精(IVF) β-hCG阳性和阴性妇女的好氧微生物培养报告进行比较统计分析。结果:73例女性中,体外受精β-hCG阳性42例(57.5%),阴性31例(43.5%)。在取卵阴道拭子、卵泡液、胚胎移植阴道拭子和导管针尖的有氧培养中,粪肠球菌高于其他细菌(链球菌、念珠菌、大肠杆菌和克雷伯氏菌)。在体外受精阳性与阴性的比较中,体外受精阴性妇女在取卵和胚胎移植过程中阴道拭子培养总体微生物感染率高于体外受精阳性妇女(38.71% vs. 28.57%);但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。IVF阳性妇女的卵泡液和导管尖端培养物微生物感染率略高于IVF阴性妇女(分别为54.76%比41.94%和19.05%比9.68%),但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:卵泡液、阴道拭子培养、导管尖端培养的需氧微生物培养报告与体外受精β-hCG阳性无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
588
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信