Ultrasound‐guided injection therapy with platelet‐rich plasma in recreational athletes with patellar tendinopathy: A randomized, single blinded, placebo‐controlled trial with 3 months follow‐up

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
T. Krogh, S. Kjær, Jesper Blegvad‐Nissen, Pia Jensen, T. Ellingsen, U. Fredberg
{"title":"Ultrasound‐guided injection therapy with platelet‐rich plasma in recreational athletes with patellar tendinopathy: A randomized, single blinded, placebo‐controlled trial with 3 months follow‐up","authors":"T. Krogh, S. Kjær, Jesper Blegvad‐Nissen, Pia Jensen, T. Ellingsen, U. Fredberg","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patellar tendinopathy is a common injury in athletes. In this study we wanted to examine whether 1 injection of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) was more effective than placebo (saline) in the treatment of athletes with patellar tendinopathy. Twenty‐four athletes with patellar tendinopathy of at least 6 months’ duration were randomly assigned to receive either a blinded injection of PRP (n = 12) or saline (n = 12). The primary endpoint was improvement in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment‐Patella (VISA‐P) score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in pain at rest, while walking, and when the tendon was squeezed. Ultrasonographic outcomes were changes in tendon thickness, the presence and size of a central hypoechoic area, and color Doppler activity. There was no difference between the PRP group and the saline group with regard to the primary outcome, VISA‐P score mean difference 5.4 (95% confidence interval –5.5 to 16.4, P = 0.316). There were no statistically significant differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, in this blinded, randomized, controlled trial, there was no improvement in VISA‐P score, ultrasonography, or any other outcome measures 3 months after an injection of PRP compared with a saline injection.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"344 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.232","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patellar tendinopathy is a common injury in athletes. In this study we wanted to examine whether 1 injection of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) was more effective than placebo (saline) in the treatment of athletes with patellar tendinopathy. Twenty‐four athletes with patellar tendinopathy of at least 6 months’ duration were randomly assigned to receive either a blinded injection of PRP (n = 12) or saline (n = 12). The primary endpoint was improvement in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment‐Patella (VISA‐P) score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in pain at rest, while walking, and when the tendon was squeezed. Ultrasonographic outcomes were changes in tendon thickness, the presence and size of a central hypoechoic area, and color Doppler activity. There was no difference between the PRP group and the saline group with regard to the primary outcome, VISA‐P score mean difference 5.4 (95% confidence interval –5.5 to 16.4, P = 0.316). There were no statistically significant differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, in this blinded, randomized, controlled trial, there was no improvement in VISA‐P score, ultrasonography, or any other outcome measures 3 months after an injection of PRP compared with a saline injection.
超声引导下用富含血小板的血浆注射治疗患有髌腱病的娱乐性运动员:一项随机、单盲、安慰剂对照试验,随访3个月
髌腱病是运动员常见的损伤。在这项研究中,我们想检查1次注射富含血小板的血浆(PRP)在治疗运动员髌腱病方面是否比安慰剂(生理盐水)更有效。24名患有持续时间至少6个月的髌腱病的运动员被随机分配接受PRP(n=12)或生理盐水的盲法注射。主要终点是3个月时维多利亚体育评估研究所(VISA-P)评分的改善。次要结果包括休息时、行走时和肌腱挤压时疼痛的变化。超声检查的结果是肌腱厚度、中心低回声区的存在和大小以及彩色多普勒活动的变化。PRP组和生理盐水组在主要结果方面没有差异,VISA‐P评分平均差5.4(95%置信区间-5.5至16.4,P=0.316)。在任何次要结果中都没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。总之,在这项盲法、随机、对照试验中,与盐水注射相比,注射PRP后3个月的VISA‐P评分、超声检查或任何其他结果指标均无改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信