Effect of Flutter Along with Conventional Chest Physiotherapy on Peak Expiratory Flow Rate among Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sabnam Kapadia, T. Chokshi, M. Patel
{"title":"Effect of Flutter Along with Conventional Chest Physiotherapy on Peak Expiratory Flow Rate among Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients","authors":"Sabnam Kapadia, T. Chokshi, M. Patel","doi":"10.4103/jss.jss_213_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is extensively used to treat patients with heart problems. As it is a major surgery involving the thoracic cavity, lung function may be compromised postoperatively. Pulmonary dysfunction following CABG is inevitable. Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is a treatment to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. Flutter is a form of positive expiratory pressure device in combination with high-frequency oscillation; it gives independence to patients and is easy to use for airway clearance. Aim: To study the effect of flutter along with conventional CPT on peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) among CABG patients. Methodology: Twenty-seven CABG patients were selected through simple random sampling and assigned into two groups. Group 1 consisting of 13 patients was treated with conventional CPT, whereas Group 2 consisting of 14 patients was treated with flutter along conventional CPT. Pre- and post-physiotherapy PEFR was noted. Results: The data were analyzed using a paired and unpaired t-test, and there was significant improvement seen in Group 2 as compared to Group 1 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Flutter device should be amalgamated as a routine practice along with other CPT techniques in CABG patients which can have positive results in airway clearance and thereby improving PEFR.","PeriodicalId":55681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Scientific Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Scientific Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jss.jss_213_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is extensively used to treat patients with heart problems. As it is a major surgery involving the thoracic cavity, lung function may be compromised postoperatively. Pulmonary dysfunction following CABG is inevitable. Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is a treatment to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. Flutter is a form of positive expiratory pressure device in combination with high-frequency oscillation; it gives independence to patients and is easy to use for airway clearance. Aim: To study the effect of flutter along with conventional CPT on peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) among CABG patients. Methodology: Twenty-seven CABG patients were selected through simple random sampling and assigned into two groups. Group 1 consisting of 13 patients was treated with conventional CPT, whereas Group 2 consisting of 14 patients was treated with flutter along conventional CPT. Pre- and post-physiotherapy PEFR was noted. Results: The data were analyzed using a paired and unpaired t-test, and there was significant improvement seen in Group 2 as compared to Group 1 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Flutter device should be amalgamated as a routine practice along with other CPT techniques in CABG patients which can have positive results in airway clearance and thereby improving PEFR.
颤振与常规胸部物理治疗对冠状动脉搭桥术患者呼气峰值流速的影响
背景:冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)广泛用于治疗心脏病患者。由于这是一项涉及胸腔的大手术,术后肺功能可能会受损。冠状动脉旁路移植术后的肺功能障碍是不可避免的。胸部理疗(CPT)是一种预防术后肺部并发症的治疗方法。Flutter是一种与高频振荡相结合的呼气正压装置;它为患者提供了独立性,并且易于用于气道清除。目的:研究扑动联合常规CPT对CABG患者呼气峰流速(PEFR)的影响。方法:通过简单随机抽样选择27名冠状动脉搭桥术患者,并将其分为两组。由13名患者组成的第1组接受了常规CPT治疗,而由14名患者构成的第2组接受了传统CPT的扑动治疗。注意物理治疗前后的PEFR。结果:使用配对和非配对t检验对数据进行分析,与第1组相比,第2组有显著改善(P<0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Scientific Society
Journal of the Scientific Society MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信