Progressive damage in pretensioned and reinforced concrete plates against repeated impacts

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Vimal Kumar, M. Iqbal, A. Mittal
{"title":"Progressive damage in pretensioned and reinforced concrete plates against repeated impacts","authors":"Vimal Kumar, M. Iqbal, A. Mittal","doi":"10.1177/20414196221078025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is planned to explore the performance of pretensioned concrete (PC) plates under multiple impacts. A detailed investigation has been carried out on pretensioned concrete plates (0.8 × 0.8 m2) against drop impact. The plates prepared using Mix-40 and Mix-60 grade concrete have been induced with two different levels of initial prestress, that is, 1/10 and 1/5 (i.e. level-1 and level-2) times the strength of the concrete. The PC plates have been impacted by a falling impactor (2382 N) dropped from 0.5 m height. The response of those plates has been obtained and compared with the reference RC plates. The post-impact performance of the damaged plates has been further discovered by subsequently dropping the impactor multiple times from the identical height. The FE simulations of the problem have been carried out using Johnson-Holmquist-2 and metal-plasticity constitutive models for concrete and steel, respectively. The models have been initially verified with the experimental results available in literature, and subsequently the simulations for drop impact have been carried out. The simulation results are also compared with the results of drop impact experimentations performed. In general, both the pretensioned and reinforced concrete have witnessed flexural cracks at the beginning, such that pretensioned concrete witnessed lesser cracks compared to reinforced concrete. As the number of drops increased, one major splitting crack developed only in pretensioned concrete, whereas the reinforced concrete exhibited additional punching cracks. For a given concrete grade, the pretensioned concrete level-2 witnessed the smallest damage, minimal cracks, and also minimal spalling followed by the pretensioned concrete level-1 and reinforced concrete. The reinforced concrete absorbed the minimal impact energy followed by the pretensioned concrete level-1 and level-2 under the multiple impacts. The FE simulations predicted the impact force and reaction within 11.9 and 9.9% variation, respectively, with the corresponding experimental results.","PeriodicalId":46272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Protective Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Protective Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196221078025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study is planned to explore the performance of pretensioned concrete (PC) plates under multiple impacts. A detailed investigation has been carried out on pretensioned concrete plates (0.8 × 0.8 m2) against drop impact. The plates prepared using Mix-40 and Mix-60 grade concrete have been induced with two different levels of initial prestress, that is, 1/10 and 1/5 (i.e. level-1 and level-2) times the strength of the concrete. The PC plates have been impacted by a falling impactor (2382 N) dropped from 0.5 m height. The response of those plates has been obtained and compared with the reference RC plates. The post-impact performance of the damaged plates has been further discovered by subsequently dropping the impactor multiple times from the identical height. The FE simulations of the problem have been carried out using Johnson-Holmquist-2 and metal-plasticity constitutive models for concrete and steel, respectively. The models have been initially verified with the experimental results available in literature, and subsequently the simulations for drop impact have been carried out. The simulation results are also compared with the results of drop impact experimentations performed. In general, both the pretensioned and reinforced concrete have witnessed flexural cracks at the beginning, such that pretensioned concrete witnessed lesser cracks compared to reinforced concrete. As the number of drops increased, one major splitting crack developed only in pretensioned concrete, whereas the reinforced concrete exhibited additional punching cracks. For a given concrete grade, the pretensioned concrete level-2 witnessed the smallest damage, minimal cracks, and also minimal spalling followed by the pretensioned concrete level-1 and reinforced concrete. The reinforced concrete absorbed the minimal impact energy followed by the pretensioned concrete level-1 and level-2 under the multiple impacts. The FE simulations predicted the impact force and reaction within 11.9 and 9.9% variation, respectively, with the corresponding experimental results.
预应力和钢筋混凝土板在反复冲击下的渐进损伤
本研究旨在探讨预应力混凝土(PC)板在多重冲击下的性能。对预应力混凝土板(0.8 × 0.8 m2)对跌落冲击的影响进行了详细的研究。采用Mix-40和Mix-60级混凝土配制的板,分别采用混凝土强度的1/10和1/5倍(即1级和2级)初始预应力进行诱导。PC板受到从0.5 m高度落下的2382 N的冲击。得到了这些板的响应,并与参考RC板进行了比较。通过随后从相同高度多次下落冲击器,进一步发现了受损板的冲击后性能。采用Johnson-Holmquist-2和金属塑性本构模型分别对混凝土和钢进行了有限元模拟。通过文献中已有的实验结果对模型进行了初步验证,并对跌落冲击进行了模拟。并将仿真结果与跌落冲击实验结果进行了比较。一般来说,预应力混凝土和钢筋混凝土在初始阶段都出现了弯曲裂缝,因此预应力混凝土比钢筋混凝土出现的裂缝更小。随着液滴数量的增加,只在预应力混凝土中出现了一个主要的劈裂裂缝,而钢筋混凝土则出现了额外的冲孔裂缝。对于给定的混凝土等级,2级预应力混凝土的损伤最小,裂缝最小,剥落最小,其次是1级预应力混凝土和钢筋混凝土。在多重冲击下,钢筋混凝土吸收的冲击能量最小,其次是一级预应力混凝土和二级预应力混凝土。有限元模拟预测的撞击力和反作用力与实验结果的偏差分别为11.9%和9.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信