Perfiles de regulación emocional y estrés académico en estudiantes de fisioterapia

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Ramón González Cabanach, Antonio Souto-Gestal, Ramón Fernández Cervantes
{"title":"Perfiles de regulación emocional y estrés académico en estudiantes de fisioterapia","authors":"Ramón González Cabanach,&nbsp;Antonio Souto-Gestal,&nbsp;Ramón Fernández Cervantes","doi":"10.1016/j.ejeps.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A study was designed with the aim of identifying different profiles of emotional regulation in a sample of university students, and analysing the differences among the identified profiles in relation to stressors perception and psychophysiological stress responses.</p><p>The participants were 504 Spanish physiotherapy students (74% women), with a mean age of 21.06<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.74 years old, which answered the Difficulty Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the Academic Stress Questionnaire (stressors scale [ECEA] and response scale [RCEA]).</p><p>Based on Cluster analysis, three emotional regulation profiles were identified: students with high emotional regulation profile, students with low emotional regulation profile and students with low emotional regulation but high scores in emotional attention profile.</p><p>The results indicated statistically significant differences between the emotional regulation profiles in stress appraisals and psychophysiological responses. Succinctly, students with high emotional regulation profile perceived academic environment as less threatening and showed lesser scores in stress responses. Students with low emotional regulation profile and low emotional regulation but high emotional attention profile showed similar scores, with the exception of sleep disorders. Briefly, physiotherapy students who had higher scores on emotional control and acceptance, perceived the academic setting in a more adaptive way and reported fewer stress responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44987,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejeps.2017.07.002","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888899217300119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

A study was designed with the aim of identifying different profiles of emotional regulation in a sample of university students, and analysing the differences among the identified profiles in relation to stressors perception and psychophysiological stress responses.

The participants were 504 Spanish physiotherapy students (74% women), with a mean age of 21.06 ± 3.74 years old, which answered the Difficulty Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the Academic Stress Questionnaire (stressors scale [ECEA] and response scale [RCEA]).

Based on Cluster analysis, three emotional regulation profiles were identified: students with high emotional regulation profile, students with low emotional regulation profile and students with low emotional regulation but high scores in emotional attention profile.

The results indicated statistically significant differences between the emotional regulation profiles in stress appraisals and psychophysiological responses. Succinctly, students with high emotional regulation profile perceived academic environment as less threatening and showed lesser scores in stress responses. Students with low emotional regulation profile and low emotional regulation but high emotional attention profile showed similar scores, with the exception of sleep disorders. Briefly, physiotherapy students who had higher scores on emotional control and acceptance, perceived the academic setting in a more adaptive way and reported fewer stress responses.

物理治疗专业学生的情绪调节和学业压力概况
本研究旨在识别大学生不同的情绪调节特征,并分析不同特征在压力源感知和心理生理应激反应方面的差异。研究对象为504名西班牙理疗专业学生(女性占74%),平均年龄21.06±3.74岁,填写困难情绪调节量表(DERS)和学业压力问卷(应激源量表[ECEA]和反应量表[RCEA])。通过聚类分析,确定了三种情绪调节特征:高情绪调节特征学生、低情绪调节特征学生和低情绪调节但情绪注意特征得分高的学生。结果表明,压力评价中的情绪调节特征与心理生理反应之间存在统计学差异。简而言之,情绪调节能力强的学生认为学术环境威胁性较小,压力反应得分较低。除睡眠障碍外,低情绪调节型学生和低情绪调节但高情绪注意型学生的得分相似。简而言之,在情绪控制和接受方面得分较高的物理治疗学生,以更适应的方式感知学术环境,并报告较少的压力反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信