Assessment of mental health among hospital-discharged patients of COVID-19 in North India: A cross-sectional study

Q4 Psychology
Preeti Kour, Manmeet Singh, B. Sahni
{"title":"Assessment of mental health among hospital-discharged patients of COVID-19 in North India: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Preeti Kour, Manmeet Singh, B. Sahni","doi":"10.4103/amh.amh_147_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Psychological impact of COVID-19 is an emerging area of interest among researchers worldwide. We aimed to study the prevalence of anxiety and depression among COVID-19 survivors and its association with individual characteristics including demographic variables.\n \n \n \n One hundred and fifty COVID-19 survivors from a tertiary care hospital were contacted to collect information regarding anxiety and depression using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The Pearson’s Chi-square was used for univariate analysis of categorical variables. The Mann–Whitney test was used to check the significance between group medians.\n \n \n \n 21.3% of the survivors (n = 32) reported postdischarge COVID-19 anxiety. Mild, moderate, and moderately severe anxiety was reported by 17.3%, 3.3%, and 0.7% of the patients, respectively, on using the GAD-7 questionnaire. PHQ-9 revealed that 29.3% (n = 44) had depression. Minimal, mild, moderate, and moderately severe depression was reported by 19.3%, 24.0%, 2.0%, and 3.3% of the respondents, respectively. None of the survivors had severe anxiety or depression. In both the questionnaires, variation in median scores was statistically significant with age, whereas for GAD-7 scores, the difference in median scores was statistically significant only for gender. On analysis, age above 40 years was a statistically significant determinant for both anxiety (P = 0.041) and depression (P = 0.018) while male gender showed a statistically significant association in case of anxiety (P = 0.028). The correlation between age and respective scores and GAD-7 scores and PHQ-9 scores was also found to be significant (P < 0.001).\n \n \n \n These preliminary screening results provide convincing evidence of anxiety and depression among COVID-19 survivors, thus reiterating the need of timely detection and management of mental health issues through formulation of strategies to tackle the concurrent psychological comorbidities amid the ongoing pandemic.\n","PeriodicalId":36181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amh.amh_147_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychological impact of COVID-19 is an emerging area of interest among researchers worldwide. We aimed to study the prevalence of anxiety and depression among COVID-19 survivors and its association with individual characteristics including demographic variables. One hundred and fifty COVID-19 survivors from a tertiary care hospital were contacted to collect information regarding anxiety and depression using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The Pearson’s Chi-square was used for univariate analysis of categorical variables. The Mann–Whitney test was used to check the significance between group medians. 21.3% of the survivors (n = 32) reported postdischarge COVID-19 anxiety. Mild, moderate, and moderately severe anxiety was reported by 17.3%, 3.3%, and 0.7% of the patients, respectively, on using the GAD-7 questionnaire. PHQ-9 revealed that 29.3% (n = 44) had depression. Minimal, mild, moderate, and moderately severe depression was reported by 19.3%, 24.0%, 2.0%, and 3.3% of the respondents, respectively. None of the survivors had severe anxiety or depression. In both the questionnaires, variation in median scores was statistically significant with age, whereas for GAD-7 scores, the difference in median scores was statistically significant only for gender. On analysis, age above 40 years was a statistically significant determinant for both anxiety (P = 0.041) and depression (P = 0.018) while male gender showed a statistically significant association in case of anxiety (P = 0.028). The correlation between age and respective scores and GAD-7 scores and PHQ-9 scores was also found to be significant (P < 0.001). These preliminary screening results provide convincing evidence of anxiety and depression among COVID-19 survivors, thus reiterating the need of timely detection and management of mental health issues through formulation of strategies to tackle the concurrent psychological comorbidities amid the ongoing pandemic.
印度北部COVID-19出院患者心理健康评估:一项横断面研究
新冠肺炎的心理影响是世界各地研究人员感兴趣的一个新兴领域。我们旨在研究新冠肺炎幸存者中焦虑和抑郁的患病率及其与包括人口统计学变量在内的个体特征的关系。联系来自三级护理医院的150名新冠肺炎幸存者,使用广泛性焦虑障碍-7(GAD-7)量表和患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)收集有关焦虑和抑郁的信息。皮尔逊卡方用于分类变量的单变量分析。Mann-Whitney检验用于检验各组中位数之间的显著性。21.3%的幸存者(n=32)报告出院后新冠肺炎焦虑。在使用GAD-7问卷时,17.3%、3.3%和0.7%的患者分别报告了轻度、中度和中度严重焦虑。PHQ-9显示29.3%(n=44)患有抑郁症。19.3%、24.0%、2.0%和3.3%的受访者报告了轻度、轻度、中度和中度重度抑郁症。没有一个幸存者有严重的焦虑或抑郁。在两份问卷中,中位数得分随年龄的变化具有统计学意义,而对于GAD-7得分,中位数得分的差异仅对性别具有统计学意义。在分析中,40岁以上的年龄是焦虑(P=0.041)和抑郁(P=0.018)的统计学显著决定因素,而男性在焦虑情况下表现出统计学显著的相关性(P=0.028)。年龄与各自得分、GAD-7得分和PHQ-9得分之间的相关性也被发现是显著的(P<0.001)。这些初步筛查结果提供了新冠肺炎幸存者中焦虑和抑郁的令人信服的证据,从而重申需要通过制定策略来及时发现和管理心理健康问题,以应对持续大流行期间并发的心理合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Mental Health
Archives of Mental Health Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信