Persistence and recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from abiotic and biotic surfaces found in meat processing plants

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Tristan Russell, Guerrino Macori, Lauren Russell, Grace Mulcahy, Dónal Sammin, Séamus Fanning, Gerald Barry
{"title":"Persistence and recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from abiotic and biotic surfaces found in meat processing plants","authors":"Tristan Russell,&nbsp;Guerrino Macori,&nbsp;Lauren Russell,&nbsp;Grace Mulcahy,&nbsp;Dónal Sammin,&nbsp;Séamus Fanning,&nbsp;Gerald Barry","doi":"10.1111/jfs.13086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The meat processing industry was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The unique conditions in meat processing plants (MPPs) were recognized to have the potential to increase SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Should SARS-CoV-2 persist for extended periods in these built environments, this may contribute to increased risk of virus transmission. To test this hypothesis, SARS-CoV-2 persistence was assessed in conditions reflective of a MPP. Different biotic/abiotic materials were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 and recovery of viable virus measured over time. Findings showed it was possible to recover SARS-CoV-2 from beef, pork, and salmon for at least 22 days at −20°C and for at least 12 days at +4°C. SARS-CoV-2 recovery from salmon scales and salmon flesh was similar, but viable virus recovered from pork fat was significantly reduced compared to pork meat. In parallel, foods purchased from Irish supermarkets during a COVID-19 wave were contemporaneously tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA but none of the samples tested positive by RT-qPCR. Viable SARS-CoV-2 can be inactivated on food or abiotic surfaces by incubation at 56°C or 75°C but fomite transmission during MPP outbreaks cannot be ruled out due to the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from stainless steel and work clothing fabric for up to 10 h under representative conditions. These data support a multilayered approach to reducing the risk of airborne infections such as SARS-CoV-2 that should include mitigations such as increased ventilation, mask wearing, and the disinfection of work surfaces to reduce the amount of SARS-CoV-2 in the meat processing plant environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"43 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfs.13086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.13086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The meat processing industry was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The unique conditions in meat processing plants (MPPs) were recognized to have the potential to increase SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Should SARS-CoV-2 persist for extended periods in these built environments, this may contribute to increased risk of virus transmission. To test this hypothesis, SARS-CoV-2 persistence was assessed in conditions reflective of a MPP. Different biotic/abiotic materials were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 and recovery of viable virus measured over time. Findings showed it was possible to recover SARS-CoV-2 from beef, pork, and salmon for at least 22 days at −20°C and for at least 12 days at +4°C. SARS-CoV-2 recovery from salmon scales and salmon flesh was similar, but viable virus recovered from pork fat was significantly reduced compared to pork meat. In parallel, foods purchased from Irish supermarkets during a COVID-19 wave were contemporaneously tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA but none of the samples tested positive by RT-qPCR. Viable SARS-CoV-2 can be inactivated on food or abiotic surfaces by incubation at 56°C or 75°C but fomite transmission during MPP outbreaks cannot be ruled out due to the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from stainless steel and work clothing fabric for up to 10 h under representative conditions. These data support a multilayered approach to reducing the risk of airborne infections such as SARS-CoV-2 that should include mitigations such as increased ventilation, mask wearing, and the disinfection of work surfaces to reduce the amount of SARS-CoV-2 in the meat processing plant environment.

Abstract Image

肉类加工厂中发现的非生物和生物表面的SARS - CoV - 2的持续存在和恢复
肉类加工行业受到2019冠状病毒病疫情的负面影响。肉类加工厂的独特条件被认为有可能增加严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的传播。如果严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型在这些建筑环境中长期存在,这可能会增加病毒传播的风险。为了验证这一假设,在反映MPP的条件下评估了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的持续性。用SARS‐CoV‐2接种不同的生物/非生物材料,并随着时间的推移测量活病毒的回收率。研究结果表明,从牛肉、猪肉和三文鱼中恢复SARS冠状病毒2型至少22年是可能的 −20°C条件下的天数和至少12天 在+4°C。从三文鱼鳞片和三文鱼肉中回收的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型相似,但与猪肉相比,从猪肉脂肪中回收的活病毒显著减少。与此同时,在新冠肺炎疫情期间从爱尔兰超市购买的食品同时进行了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型核糖核酸的检测,但没有一个样本通过RT-qPCR检测呈阳性。通过在56°C或75°C下孵育,可以在食物或非生物表面灭活活活的SARS‐CoV-2,但不能排除MPP爆发期间的寄生虫传播,因为SARS‐CoV‐2可以从不锈钢和工作服织物中恢复长达10年 h。这些数据支持一种多层次的方法来降低空气传播感染(如严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型)的风险,其中应包括增加通风、戴口罩和工作表面消毒等缓解措施,以减少肉类加工厂环境中严重急性呼吸系统冠状病毒2型的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Safety
Journal of Food Safety 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信