Evaluasi Program EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN PENDIDIKAN OLEH PENDIDIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEKNIK KOMPUTER DAN JARINGAN DI SMKN 1 NEGERIKATON - LAMPUNG

A. Wahyudi
{"title":"Evaluasi Program EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN PENDIDIKAN OLEH PENDIDIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEKNIK KOMPUTER DAN JARINGAN DI SMKN 1 NEGERIKATON - LAMPUNG","authors":"A. Wahyudi","doi":"10.21009/jep.0102.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this evaluation study is to determine the level of successful implementation of assessment standards conducted by educators on productive subjects Computer and Network Engineering (TKJ) in SMKN 1 Negerikaton Lampung Province using Model Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM). Methods of data collection are done through interviews, observation, document studies and questionnaires. This study focuses on assessments made by educators who are components of research principles, assessment forms, assessment mechanisms, assessment procedures and assessment instruments. The result of the research shows that for the component of assessment principles, the percentage of 65.5% with moderate / moderate category, for the forms of appraisal is 62% with moderate / moderate category, while for the rating mechanism is 54.3% in moderate / moderate category, for the procedure Assessment of 42.4% with the category of less / low, and for penilain instruments of 49.3% with moderate / moderate category. From these results it is concluded that for the implementation of educational assessment standards by educators are in moderate / moderate category with a percentage of 54.7%. These results do not meet the program standards that require 75%. This certainly requires schools to provide training or training to educators, especially about the assessment. ","PeriodicalId":34104,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.0102.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this evaluation study is to determine the level of successful implementation of assessment standards conducted by educators on productive subjects Computer and Network Engineering (TKJ) in SMKN 1 Negerikaton Lampung Province using Model Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM). Methods of data collection are done through interviews, observation, document studies and questionnaires. This study focuses on assessments made by educators who are components of research principles, assessment forms, assessment mechanisms, assessment procedures and assessment instruments. The result of the research shows that for the component of assessment principles, the percentage of 65.5% with moderate / moderate category, for the forms of appraisal is 62% with moderate / moderate category, while for the rating mechanism is 54.3% in moderate / moderate category, for the procedure Assessment of 42.4% with the category of less / low, and for penilain instruments of 49.3% with moderate / moderate category. From these results it is concluded that for the implementation of educational assessment standards by educators are in moderate / moderate category with a percentage of 54.7%. These results do not meet the program standards that require 75%. This certainly requires schools to provide training or training to educators, especially about the assessment. 
SMC 1 NEERIKATON-LAMPUNG石油研究计算机技术和网络改进指标实施情况评估
本评估研究的目的是确定教育工作者使用模型差异评估模型(DEM)在SMKN 1 Negerikaton Lampung省成功实施生产性科目计算机和网络工程(TKJ)评估标准的水平。数据收集方法包括访谈、观察、文献研究和问卷调查。本研究侧重于教育工作者的评估,这些评估是研究原则、评估表格、评估机制、评估程序和评估工具的组成部分。研究结果表明,对于评估原则的组成部分,65.5%的人属于中等/中等类别,对于评估形式,62%的人属于中度/中等类别;而对于评级机制,54.3%的人属于中/中度类别,42.4%的人属于低/低类别,阴茎器械为49.3%,属于中度/中度类别。从这些结果可以得出结论,教育工作者执行教育评估标准的比例为54.7%,属于中等/中等类别。这些结果不符合要求75%的项目标准。这当然要求学校为教育工作者提供培训或培训,尤其是关于评估的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信