Evaluation of Drug-Related Problems of Intensive Care Unit Patients by Clinical Pharmacists: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ahmet Çakır, Hasan Memiş, Zeynep Ülkü Gün, Murat Bıçakcıoğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of Drug-Related Problems of Intensive Care Unit Patients by Clinical Pharmacists: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Ahmet Çakır, Hasan Memiş, Zeynep Ülkü Gün, Murat Bıçakcıoğlu","doi":"10.4274/tjps.galenos.2023.44459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) and risk factors associated with the emergence of DRPs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients in the anesthesiology and reanimation ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Classification for DRPs version 9.1. The association between various patient-related factors, and having DRPs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 222 patients were included in the study, 128 of which were male (57.7%). The number of DRPs was 388 in 135 patients (1.75 ± 2.47 DRPs per patient). The group in which at least 1 DRP was identified, the duration of hospitalization was longer than in the group in which no DRP was identified (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the groups in which there was the presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission or mortality, the mean DRP count was significantly higher than that in the other group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Age, duration of hospitalization, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at admission had positive relationships with the DRP count, but the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) showed a negative relationship (<i>p</i> < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.001), in which the age of the patient, GCS score, APACHE II score at admission, duration of hospitalization, and presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission were included, only the APACHE II score at admission and duration of hospitalization significantly affected the emergence of DRPs. The major problem was related to treatment effectiveness (47.9%), followed by treatment safety problems (29.9%). The major causes of these problems were dose selection (44.0%) and drug selection (36.8). Interventions were made at the drug (97.2%) and prescriber level (2.3%). The acceptance rate of interventions and resolution rate of the DRPs were 93.6% and 85.1%, respectively. The top three medications that caused DRPs the most were as follows: meropenem, colistin, and piperacillin/tazobactam.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical pharmacists can detect and treat DRPs quickly. Our analysis shows that clinical pharmacy services are needed in high-DRP wards like ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":23378,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2023.44459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) and risk factors associated with the emergence of DRPs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients in the anesthesiology and reanimation ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Classification for DRPs version 9.1. The association between various patient-related factors, and having DRPs were evaluated.

Results: In total, 222 patients were included in the study, 128 of which were male (57.7%). The number of DRPs was 388 in 135 patients (1.75 ± 2.47 DRPs per patient). The group in which at least 1 DRP was identified, the duration of hospitalization was longer than in the group in which no DRP was identified (p < 0.001). In the groups in which there was the presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission or mortality, the mean DRP count was significantly higher than that in the other group (p < 0.05). Age, duration of hospitalization, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at admission had positive relationships with the DRP count, but the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) showed a negative relationship (p < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression analysis (p < 0.001), in which the age of the patient, GCS score, APACHE II score at admission, duration of hospitalization, and presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission were included, only the APACHE II score at admission and duration of hospitalization significantly affected the emergence of DRPs. The major problem was related to treatment effectiveness (47.9%), followed by treatment safety problems (29.9%). The major causes of these problems were dose selection (44.0%) and drug selection (36.8). Interventions were made at the drug (97.2%) and prescriber level (2.3%). The acceptance rate of interventions and resolution rate of the DRPs were 93.6% and 85.1%, respectively. The top three medications that caused DRPs the most were as follows: meropenem, colistin, and piperacillin/tazobactam.

Conclusion: Clinical pharmacists can detect and treat DRPs quickly. Our analysis shows that clinical pharmacy services are needed in high-DRP wards like ICU.

临床药剂师对重症监护病房患者药物相关问题的评估:一项回顾性纵向研究
目的本研究的目的是确定重症监护病房(ICU)患者药物相关问题(DRPs)和与DRPs出现相关的危险因素。此外,它旨在启发那些考虑在未来专攻重症监护药学领域的药剂师。方法在某大学附属三级医院麻醉与复苏ICU进行回顾性纵向研究。临床药师鉴定的DRPs按欧洲药学保健网络DRPs分类v9.1进行分类。通过统计分析检验DRPs、各种患者相关因素与DRPs发生相关危险因素之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
79
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信