Diagnostic accuracy of Lateral X-Ray of Cervical Spine in detection of fracture in hospitalized patients.

F. Ahmed, Sanobar Bughio, H. Rehman, Kashif Shazlee, Anum Sultan, Hina Pathan, Gulraiz Khanzada
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Lateral X-Ray of Cervical Spine in detection of fracture in hospitalized patients.","authors":"F. Ahmed, Sanobar Bughio, H. Rehman, Kashif Shazlee, Anum Sultan, Hina Pathan, Gulraiz Khanzada","doi":"10.29052/ijehsr.v11.i2.2023.68-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lateral X-ray of the cervical spine (LCSX) is a common diagnostic tool to detect fractures in hospitalized patients. Its non-invasive nature and cost-effectiveness make it a preferred imaging technique for rapid identification of cervical spine fractures. However, its diagnostic accuracy is still a subject of debate and further research is needed to establish its reliability and validity. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LCSX in detecting fractures in hospitalized patients, using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) as the gold standard. \nMethodology: This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. The study included 431 male and female patients aged between 18 to 60 years referred by the primary medical team to the Radiology Department for both LCSX and MDCT to detect cervical spine fractures. Patients with known cases of cervical spine fractures determined by history, examination, and previous radiological modalities like LCSX, MDCT, or MRI at the time of imaging were included. \nResults: LCSX identified 63 cases (14.6%) as having cervical spine fractures, while 368 cases (85.3%) were reported as not having cervical spine fractures. However, on MDCT, 116 cases (26.9%) out of the 431 cases were found to have cervical spine fractures, while 315 cases (73.08%) were reported as not having cervical spine fractures. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of LCSX were calculated. The sensitivity of LCSX was found to be 58.35%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 85.59%, and diagnostic accuracy was 87.70%. \nConclusion: LCSX has low sensitivity as a diagnostic tool in detecting cervical spine fractures in trauma patients, resulting in missed diagnoses of critical cervical spine fractures and compromised patient care, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":34196,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v11.i2.2023.68-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral X-ray of the cervical spine (LCSX) is a common diagnostic tool to detect fractures in hospitalized patients. Its non-invasive nature and cost-effectiveness make it a preferred imaging technique for rapid identification of cervical spine fractures. However, its diagnostic accuracy is still a subject of debate and further research is needed to establish its reliability and validity. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LCSX in detecting fractures in hospitalized patients, using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) as the gold standard. Methodology: This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. The study included 431 male and female patients aged between 18 to 60 years referred by the primary medical team to the Radiology Department for both LCSX and MDCT to detect cervical spine fractures. Patients with known cases of cervical spine fractures determined by history, examination, and previous radiological modalities like LCSX, MDCT, or MRI at the time of imaging were included. Results: LCSX identified 63 cases (14.6%) as having cervical spine fractures, while 368 cases (85.3%) were reported as not having cervical spine fractures. However, on MDCT, 116 cases (26.9%) out of the 431 cases were found to have cervical spine fractures, while 315 cases (73.08%) were reported as not having cervical spine fractures. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of LCSX were calculated. The sensitivity of LCSX was found to be 58.35%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 85.59%, and diagnostic accuracy was 87.70%. Conclusion: LCSX has low sensitivity as a diagnostic tool in detecting cervical spine fractures in trauma patients, resulting in missed diagnoses of critical cervical spine fractures and compromised patient care, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality.
颈椎侧位X线片对住院患者骨折的诊断准确性。
背景:颈椎侧位X线片(LCSX)是检测住院患者骨折的常用诊断工具。其非侵入性和成本效益使其成为快速识别颈椎骨折的首选成像技术。然而,其诊断准确性仍然是一个有争议的话题,需要进一步的研究来确定其可靠性和有效性。本研究旨在以多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)为金标准,确定LCSX在检测住院患者骨折方面的诊断准确性。方法:这项横断面回顾性研究在卡拉奇的一家三级护理医院进行。该研究包括431名年龄在18至60岁之间的男性和女性患者,由初级医疗团队转诊至放射科进行LCSX和MDCT检查,以检测颈椎骨折。包括通过病史、检查和成像时的LCSX、MDCT或MRI等先前放射学检查确定的已知颈椎骨折病例的患者。结果:LCSX发现63例(14.6%)有颈椎骨折,368例(85.3%)没有颈椎骨折。然而,在MDCT中,431例病例中有116例(26.9%)被发现有颈椎骨折,而315例(73.08%)被报告没有颈椎骨折。计算LCSX的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性。LCSX的敏感性为58.35%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为85.59%,诊断准确率为87.70%,这可能导致发病率和死亡率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信