Victorians on Broadway: Literature, Adaptation, and the Modern American Musical by Sharon Aronofsky Weltman (review)

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sooyoung Chung
{"title":"Victorians on Broadway: Literature, Adaptation, and the Modern American Musical by Sharon Aronofsky Weltman (review)","authors":"Sooyoung Chung","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2021.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Narrative Bonds is primarily concerned with the impact of multiple narrative voices on readings of the Victorian novel, the brief engagement with Mayhew’s London Labour and London Poor points toward the possibility of applying Valint’s critical approach to Victorian multinarrator structures more broadly. For example, the serialization of Hard Times (1854) and North and South (1855), taken together with the reporting on industrial labor conditions in England found throughout Household Words, might be seen as an example of a multinarrator structure outside the Victorian novel. Dickens, Elizabeth Gaskell, and other contributors to Household Words all narrate the horrors and dehumanization that accompanied the rapid industrialization of the north of England; their multiple narrative perspectives achieve a sort of consensus and center the plight of the industrial worker for the readers of Household Words. In Narrative Bonds, Valint encourages this sort of work, in which the presence of multiple narrative voices suggests collaboration and interdependence. The critical framework she develops in her monograph offers a productive approach to reading dis/ability, gender, privilege, and a host of other critical concerns in Victorian texts that have perhaps become overly familiar. Shifting our attention to the relationship among the multiple narrators of these texts not only provides new avenues for research, scholarship, and teaching but also prompts us to reflect on and reconsider our own narratives about Victorian culture and literature.","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Periodicals Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2021.0054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Narrative Bonds is primarily concerned with the impact of multiple narrative voices on readings of the Victorian novel, the brief engagement with Mayhew’s London Labour and London Poor points toward the possibility of applying Valint’s critical approach to Victorian multinarrator structures more broadly. For example, the serialization of Hard Times (1854) and North and South (1855), taken together with the reporting on industrial labor conditions in England found throughout Household Words, might be seen as an example of a multinarrator structure outside the Victorian novel. Dickens, Elizabeth Gaskell, and other contributors to Household Words all narrate the horrors and dehumanization that accompanied the rapid industrialization of the north of England; their multiple narrative perspectives achieve a sort of consensus and center the plight of the industrial worker for the readers of Household Words. In Narrative Bonds, Valint encourages this sort of work, in which the presence of multiple narrative voices suggests collaboration and interdependence. The critical framework she develops in her monograph offers a productive approach to reading dis/ability, gender, privilege, and a host of other critical concerns in Victorian texts that have perhaps become overly familiar. Shifting our attention to the relationship among the multiple narrators of these texts not only provides new avenues for research, scholarship, and teaching but also prompts us to reflect on and reconsider our own narratives about Victorian culture and literature.
百老汇的维多利亚时代:文学、改编和现代美国音乐剧莎朗·阿罗诺夫斯基·韦尔特曼(书评)
《叙事纽带》主要关注多种叙事声音对阅读维多利亚时代小说的影响,对梅休的《伦敦劳工》和《伦敦穷人》的简短介绍指出了将瓦利特的批判方法更广泛地应用于维多利亚时代多叙述者结构的可能性。例如,《艰难时期》(1854年)和《南北》(1855年)的连载,以及《家常话》中对英国工业劳动条件的报道,可能被视为维多利亚时代小说之外的多叙述者结构的一个例子。狄更斯、伊丽莎白·盖斯凯尔和其他《家常话》的作者都叙述了伴随英格兰北部快速工业化而来的恐怖和非人化;他们的多重叙事视角达成了一种共识,为《家常话》的读者聚焦了产业工人的困境。在《Narrative Bonds》中,Valint鼓励这种类型的工作,在这种工作中,多种叙事声音的存在表明了合作和相互依存。她在她的专著中发展的批判性框架提供了一种富有成效的方法来阅读残疾/能力,性别,特权,以及维多利亚时代文本中可能变得过于熟悉的许多其他关键问题。将我们的注意力转移到这些文本的多重叙述者之间的关系上,不仅为研究、学术和教学提供了新的途径,而且还促使我们反思和重新考虑我们自己对维多利亚文化和文学的叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Victorian Periodicals Review
Victorian Periodicals Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信