María Cabezas-García, María Elena De la Peña Fernández, José Manuel Andreu Rodríguez
{"title":"Factores psicosociales asociados a la credibilidad del testimonio en Abuso Sexual Infantil","authors":"María Cabezas-García, María Elena De la Peña Fernández, José Manuel Andreu Rodríguez","doi":"10.6018/analesps.418161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Credibility assessment in Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) poses a major challenge for forensic psychology. The lack of evidence supporting the determination of the real occurrence of the abuse requires additional approaches to assess credibility. The purpose of this research is to explore the existence of psychosocial factors associated with testimony credibility in CSA. Method: Ninety-nine CSA cases characterized as Credible (C) or Not Credible (NC) were evaluated. The age range of the group spanned 4 to 17 years (M = 11.31, SD = 3.92) with 87 (85.9%) cases corresponding to females. Group C incuded 68 cases and NC group the remaining 31. The relationship between the expert opinion (C/NC) and psychosocial factors was evaluated using contingency tables and chi-square analysis. Results: Significant differences in variables such as the presence of sexual and emotional imbalances, dysfunctional family dynamics, parent litigation, or legal actions against a relative were found. Conclusions: Certain variables were commonly present in the NC group, such as symptoms of a sexual nature, dysfunctional familiar dynamics, divorced parents, presence of litigation between parents, or legal actions against the biological father.\n \n Antecedentes: La credibilidad del testimonio en Abuso Sexual Infantil (ASI) es un reto para la psicología forense por falta de otras pruebas que ayuden a determinar judicialmente la ocurrencia del abuso. Existen diferentes enfoques para valorar la credibilidad del testimonio, aunque la mayoría presenta limitaciones. El propósito de esta investigación es explorar la existencia de indicadores psicosociales asociados a la credibilidad del testimonio en ASI para complementar las valoraciones periciales. Método: La muestra se compone de 99 casos de ASI evaluados como Creíbles (C) o No Creíbles (NC) con una edad que osciló entre los 4-17 años (M = 11.31, DT = 3.92) y de los que 87 (85.9%) fueron niñas. El grupo C contenía 68 casos y el NC 31. Se examinó la relación entre el dictamen pericial (C/NC) y factores psicosociales mediante tablas de contingencia y análisis de chi-cuadrado. Resultados: Encontramos diferencias significativas en variables como la presencia de desajustes sexuales y emocionales, una dinámica familiar disfuncional, el litigio entre progenitores o la denuncia contra un familiar. Conclusiones: Se identifican variables presentes de forma habitual en el grupo NC como la presencia de sintomatología de índole sexual, dinámicas disfuncionales, padres divorciados, presencia de litigio entre los progenitores o la denuncia contra el padre biológico.\n ","PeriodicalId":55521,"journal":{"name":"Anales De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.418161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Credibility assessment in Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) poses a major challenge for forensic psychology. The lack of evidence supporting the determination of the real occurrence of the abuse requires additional approaches to assess credibility. The purpose of this research is to explore the existence of psychosocial factors associated with testimony credibility in CSA. Method: Ninety-nine CSA cases characterized as Credible (C) or Not Credible (NC) were evaluated. The age range of the group spanned 4 to 17 years (M = 11.31, SD = 3.92) with 87 (85.9%) cases corresponding to females. Group C incuded 68 cases and NC group the remaining 31. The relationship between the expert opinion (C/NC) and psychosocial factors was evaluated using contingency tables and chi-square analysis. Results: Significant differences in variables such as the presence of sexual and emotional imbalances, dysfunctional family dynamics, parent litigation, or legal actions against a relative were found. Conclusions: Certain variables were commonly present in the NC group, such as symptoms of a sexual nature, dysfunctional familiar dynamics, divorced parents, presence of litigation between parents, or legal actions against the biological father.
Antecedentes: La credibilidad del testimonio en Abuso Sexual Infantil (ASI) es un reto para la psicología forense por falta de otras pruebas que ayuden a determinar judicialmente la ocurrencia del abuso. Existen diferentes enfoques para valorar la credibilidad del testimonio, aunque la mayoría presenta limitaciones. El propósito de esta investigación es explorar la existencia de indicadores psicosociales asociados a la credibilidad del testimonio en ASI para complementar las valoraciones periciales. Método: La muestra se compone de 99 casos de ASI evaluados como Creíbles (C) o No Creíbles (NC) con una edad que osciló entre los 4-17 años (M = 11.31, DT = 3.92) y de los que 87 (85.9%) fueron niñas. El grupo C contenía 68 casos y el NC 31. Se examinó la relación entre el dictamen pericial (C/NC) y factores psicosociales mediante tablas de contingencia y análisis de chi-cuadrado. Resultados: Encontramos diferencias significativas en variables como la presencia de desajustes sexuales y emocionales, una dinámica familiar disfuncional, el litigio entre progenitores o la denuncia contra un familiar. Conclusiones: Se identifican variables presentes de forma habitual en el grupo NC como la presencia de sintomatología de índole sexual, dinámicas disfuncionales, padres divorciados, presencia de litigio entre los progenitores o la denuncia contra el padre biológico.
背景:儿童性虐待案件的可信度评估是法医心理学面临的一个重大挑战。由于缺乏证据支持确定虐待的真实发生,需要采取其他方法来评估可信性。本研究的目的是探讨心理社会因素的存在与证词可信性在CSA。方法:对99例具有可信(C)或不可信(NC)特征的CSA进行评估。本组年龄4 ~ 17岁,M = 11.31, SD = 3.92,女性87例(85.9%)。C组68例,NC组31例。采用列联表和卡方分析评估专家意见(C/NC)与心理社会因素之间的关系。结果:在性和情感失衡、功能失调的家庭动态、父母诉讼或对亲属的法律行动等变量上发现了显著差异。结论:某些变量在NC组中普遍存在,如性症状、不正常的亲密关系、父母离婚、父母之间存在诉讼或对生父的法律诉讼。前言:《关于虐待性儿童的证词的可信性》(《关于虐待性儿童的证词的可信性》)是根据《关于虐待性儿童的证词的可信性》(《关于虐待性儿童的证词的可信性》)第1段规定的。存在着不同的授权、信用和证明、独特的授权和mayoría目前的限制。“社会心理指标的存在性研究”propósito“社会心理指标的存在性研究”和“社会心理指标的存在性研究”以及“社会心理指标的可信度研究”。m诈骗者:La muestra se comone de 99 casos de ASI evaluados como Creíbles (C) o No Creíbles (NC) con una edad que osciló entre los 4-17 años (M = 11.31, DT = 3.92) y de los que 87 (85.9%) fueron niñas。El grupo C contenía 68 casos y El NC 31。Se examinó la relación centre el dictamen pericial (C/NC) y factores psicosociales mediante tables de contingency y análisis de chi-cuadrado。结果:不同变量的Encontramos存在显著差异,包括性失调与情绪失调、熟悉失调、诉讼失调、不熟悉失调、不熟悉失调。结论:三个识别变量存在于NC组的习惯性表现中:sintomatología性表现、dinámicas失能表现、离婚表现、诉讼表现、前代表现、反性表现、biológico性表现。
期刊介绍:
Anales de Psicologia / Annals of Psychology is a multidisciplinary journal of the various thematic areas of scientific psychology. It publishes original research articles and theoretical review in any of its basic, applied and methodological areas included within psychology.
Publishing, financing, marketing and distribution corresponds Editum: Editions of the University of Murcia (Spain). The organizational guidelines and editorial policies come from the Editorial Team (elected for four years by the Areas and / or Departments of Psychology at the University of Murcia) and the Editorial Board, composed of scholars and experts from different universities and institutions national and international. It is published in print (ISSN: 0212-9728) since 1984 and in Internet publishing (web) (ISSN: 1695-2294) since 2000. Available online full text in pdf from the vol. 1 1984.
Anales de Psicologia / Annals of Psychology maintains a system of exchange with other journals and publications of psychology in the world. Through an free exchange agreement with their respective publishers or entities responsible for editing, these journals and publications are received at the University of Murcia (Biblioteca "Luis Vives", near the Faculty of Psychology) and in return, our journal is sent to libraries and educational and research institutions such centers responsible for editing.