WHY IS LITERATURE NECESSARY FOR THEORIZING MODERN TIME?

IF 1.2 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Amit Yahav
{"title":"WHY IS LITERATURE NECESSARY FOR THEORIZING MODERN TIME?","authors":"Amit Yahav","doi":"10.1111/hith.12252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Aleida Assmann's <i>Is Time Out of Joint? On the Rise and Fall of the Modern Time Regime</i> theorizes and historicizes modern temporality by way of putting western European modernization theory into conversation with a wide range of literary references. This essay assesses the usefulness of examining modern temporality through these two discourses and explores why literary discourse seems a valuable corrective to modernization theory. Pressing further on Assmann's insights, this essay argues that modern literature is especially suited for temporal theorization because of its double commitment to, on the one hand, an absorptive aesthetics and, on the other, the linearity of its medium. Departing from Assmann, this essay also suggests that granular literary analysis—an academic practice of attention that turns a modern aesthetics into a methodology—is better equipped than the practice of survey to identify the full extent of literary aptness for temporal theorization.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"61 2","pages":"345-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hith.12252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aleida Assmann's Is Time Out of Joint? On the Rise and Fall of the Modern Time Regime theorizes and historicizes modern temporality by way of putting western European modernization theory into conversation with a wide range of literary references. This essay assesses the usefulness of examining modern temporality through these two discourses and explores why literary discourse seems a valuable corrective to modernization theory. Pressing further on Assmann's insights, this essay argues that modern literature is especially suited for temporal theorization because of its double commitment to, on the one hand, an absorptive aesthetics and, on the other, the linearity of its medium. Departing from Assmann, this essay also suggests that granular literary analysis—an academic practice of attention that turns a modern aesthetics into a methodology—is better equipped than the practice of survey to identify the full extent of literary aptness for temporal theorization.

为什么文学对于现代理论化是必要的?
阿莱达·阿斯曼的《时间失控了吗?》《近代政权的兴衰》通过将西欧现代化理论与广泛的文学参考进行对话,将近代暂时性理论化和历史化。本文评估了通过这两种话语来考察现代时间性的有用性,并探讨了为什么文学话语似乎是对现代化理论的有价值的纠正。进一步推进阿斯曼的见解,本文认为,现代文学特别适合于时间理论化,因为它的双重承诺,一方面,吸收美学,另一方面,其媒介的线性。从Assmann的观点出发,这篇文章还提出,细碎的文学分析——一种将现代美学转变为方法论的学术实践——比调查实践更适合于确定文学能力的全面程度,以进行时间理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Theory
History and Theory Multiple-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信