Pushpinder Singh, M. Gill, Mandeep Kaur, R. Mahajan, M. Kaur
{"title":"Assessment of the Radio-contrast Media-Induced Self-Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Hospital of North India: A Prospective Study","authors":"Pushpinder Singh, M. Gill, Mandeep Kaur, R. Mahajan, M. Kaur","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_381_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radio-contrast media are the agents which are used on daily basis in the radiological practice for either diagnostic or therapeutic purpose. Currently used agents are considered to be safe but not devoid of side effects. Objectives: Objectives of the study were to assess the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the patients who receive radiographic contrast media for computed tomography (CT) and intravenous pyelography (IVP), to stratify the ADRs into different types based on their time of appearance and as per their severity. Materials and Methods: A prospective and observational study of 1-year duration was done on all the patients who received radio-contrast media (Iohexol) intravenously for CT and IVP in the radiodiagnosis department. Patients who experienced ADRs were recorded for the basic demographic characteristics and types of ADRs. Stratification of ADRs as per their severity was done using common terminology criteria for adverse events scale and Modified Hartwig and Siegel ADR Severity Assessment Scale, and casualty assessment was done using Naranjo's Algorithm. Results: Out of the total 3522 patients who were included in the study, eight patients got 12 suspected ADRs with some of the patients having more than one type of ADR. The most frequent ADR was nausea and vomiting (25%), followed by fever, chills, or sweating. Incidence of ADRs was 0.23%. All the ADRs were acute and occurred within 30 min of contrast administration. As per the severity scales used, all the ADRs were mild (75%) to moderate (25%) in nature with none of the reactions to be severe. Causality assessment showed 87.5% of the reactions to be “probable” in nature. Conclusion: Low osmolar nonionic radio contrast media are associated with very low incidence of ADRs in the North Indian population.","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"14 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_381_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Radio-contrast media are the agents which are used on daily basis in the radiological practice for either diagnostic or therapeutic purpose. Currently used agents are considered to be safe but not devoid of side effects. Objectives: Objectives of the study were to assess the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the patients who receive radiographic contrast media for computed tomography (CT) and intravenous pyelography (IVP), to stratify the ADRs into different types based on their time of appearance and as per their severity. Materials and Methods: A prospective and observational study of 1-year duration was done on all the patients who received radio-contrast media (Iohexol) intravenously for CT and IVP in the radiodiagnosis department. Patients who experienced ADRs were recorded for the basic demographic characteristics and types of ADRs. Stratification of ADRs as per their severity was done using common terminology criteria for adverse events scale and Modified Hartwig and Siegel ADR Severity Assessment Scale, and casualty assessment was done using Naranjo's Algorithm. Results: Out of the total 3522 patients who were included in the study, eight patients got 12 suspected ADRs with some of the patients having more than one type of ADR. The most frequent ADR was nausea and vomiting (25%), followed by fever, chills, or sweating. Incidence of ADRs was 0.23%. All the ADRs were acute and occurred within 30 min of contrast administration. As per the severity scales used, all the ADRs were mild (75%) to moderate (25%) in nature with none of the reactions to be severe. Causality assessment showed 87.5% of the reactions to be “probable” in nature. Conclusion: Low osmolar nonionic radio contrast media are associated with very low incidence of ADRs in the North Indian population.
背景:造影剂是在日常放射实践中用于诊断或治疗目的的药剂。目前使用的药物被认为是安全的,但并非没有副作用。目的:本研究的目的是评估在计算机断层扫描(CT)和静脉肾盂造影(IVP)中使用造影剂的患者药物不良反应(adr)的发生率,并根据其出现时间和严重程度将adr分为不同的类型。材料与方法:对所有在放射诊断科静脉注射放射造影剂(碘己醇)进行CT和IVP的患者进行为期1年的前瞻性观察研究。记录发生adr的患者的基本人口学特征和adr的类型。采用不良事件量表和改良Hartwig and Siegel不良反应严重程度评定量表的通用术语标准对不良反应的严重程度进行分层,使用Naranjo算法进行人员伤亡评估。结果:纳入研究的3522例患者中,8例患者出现12例疑似ADR,部分患者出现1种以上ADR。最常见的不良反应是恶心和呕吐(25%),其次是发热、发冷或出汗。不良反应发生率为0.23%。所有不良反应均为急性,并在给药后30分钟内发生。根据使用的严重程度量表,所有不良反应在性质上为轻度(75%)至中度(25%),没有任何反应是严重的。因果关系评估显示87.5%的反应在本质上是“可能的”。结论:低渗透压非离子造影剂与印度北部人群的不良反应发生率非常低有关。