THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS-BASED ASSESSMENT TO MEASURE STUDENT CRITICAL THINKING ON CHEMICAL LEARNING USING THE CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING MODEL

N. Nahadi, W. Siswaningsih, Sarah Fadilla
{"title":"THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS-BASED ASSESSMENT TO MEASURE STUDENT CRITICAL THINKING ON CHEMICAL LEARNING USING THE CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING MODEL","authors":"N. Nahadi, W. Siswaningsih, Sarah Fadilla","doi":"10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to obtain class-based assessment instrument that can measure the critical thinking skills of students in learning chemistry using a model of contextual teaching and learning . The research method used is a research and development (R & D) with the design of the study one group pretest-posttest. The study was conducted on 34 students of class X at one of the public high schools in Bandung with the object of research in the form of assessment tools consisting of critical thinking skills test consisting of 15 multiple choice questions grounded, 3 pieces of essays, and 6 pieces of matter worksheets, observation sheet, guidance interviews, and questionnaires . The results showed that the multiple choice questions have reasoned highest validity deduce indicators and consider the results of deduction,� low reliability, level of difficulty between easy to difficult , and significant distinguishing features. Essay has the highest validity indicators ask and answer questions with high reliability, moderate difficulty level, and significant distinguishing features. Student Worksheet has the highest validity indicators ask and answer questions with very high reliability, level of difficulty between easy to moderate, and significant distinguishing instrument developed to measure students' critical thinking skills about the views of validity, with the highest validity of multiple choice questions grounded is number 4 and 13, the highest validity essay is number 1a and 1b, and the highest validity LKS numbers 1, 2, and 3. Contextual teaching and learning can be supportive in improving students' critical thinking skills that can be seen from curiousity stages through observation sheet.Keywords: class-based assessment; critical thinking skills; contextual.","PeriodicalId":33696,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain class-based assessment instrument that can measure the critical thinking skills of students in learning chemistry using a model of contextual teaching and learning . The research method used is a research and development (R & D) with the design of the study one group pretest-posttest. The study was conducted on 34 students of class X at one of the public high schools in Bandung with the object of research in the form of assessment tools consisting of critical thinking skills test consisting of 15 multiple choice questions grounded, 3 pieces of essays, and 6 pieces of matter worksheets, observation sheet, guidance interviews, and questionnaires . The results showed that the multiple choice questions have reasoned highest validity deduce indicators and consider the results of deduction,� low reliability, level of difficulty between easy to difficult , and significant distinguishing features. Essay has the highest validity indicators ask and answer questions with high reliability, moderate difficulty level, and significant distinguishing features. Student Worksheet has the highest validity indicators ask and answer questions with very high reliability, level of difficulty between easy to moderate, and significant distinguishing instrument developed to measure students' critical thinking skills about the views of validity, with the highest validity of multiple choice questions grounded is number 4 and 13, the highest validity essay is number 1a and 1b, and the highest validity LKS numbers 1, 2, and 3. Contextual teaching and learning can be supportive in improving students' critical thinking skills that can be seen from curiousity stages through observation sheet.Keywords: class-based assessment; critical thinking skills; contextual.
运用情境教学模式,发展以课堂为基础的评估,以衡量学生对化学学习的批判性思维
本研究的目的是在情境教学模式下,获得一种能够衡量学生在化学学习过程中批判性思维能力的课堂评估工具。本研究采用的研究与开发(r&d)的研究设计一组前测后测。本研究以万隆市一所公立高中X班34名学生为研究对象,评估工具为批判性思维能力测试,包括15道选择题、3篇论文、6张问题练习题、观察表、指导访谈和问卷调查。结果表明,选择题具有推理效度最高的推导指标,且考虑推导结果的信度较低,难易程度介于难易之间,具有显著的区别特征。文章的效度指标最高,提问和回答问题的信度高,难度适中,具有显著的显著特征。学生工作表具有最高效度指标,提问和回答的问题具有非常高的信度,难度水平在容易到中等之间,并且开发了显著的区分工具来衡量学生对效度观点的批判性思维技能,其中多项选择题的最高效度是编号4和13,最高效度的短文是编号1a和1b,以及最高效度的LKS编号1,2和3。情境教学有助于提高学生的批判性思维能力,从好奇阶段通过观察表就可以看出这一点。关键词:班级评价;批判性思维能力;上下文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信