Effects of progressive inquiry on cognitive and affective learning outcomes in adolescents’ geography education

M. Kuisma, P. Nokelainen
{"title":"Effects of progressive inquiry on cognitive and affective learning outcomes in adolescents’ geography education","authors":"M. Kuisma, P. Nokelainen","doi":"10.14786/FLR.V6I2.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescents need skills to acquire information and compare, analyze, transform, and experiment with knowledge. However, little research has been conducted on the content and pedagogical practices that are necessary to achieve these skills. This article seeks to contribute to this discussion because geography enables the attainment of the so-called higher-order thinking skills, and the progressive inquiry model provides suitable pedagogical practices. This study provides empirical evidence on the effects of the progressive inquiry teaching method and learning models on cognitive and affective learning outcomes. This paper focuses on learning outcomes among 253 Finnish middle and upper secondary school students. This comparison between different developmental stages reveals the effects of the teaching and learning methods in question. The results indicate that the progressive inquiry method improves cognitive learning results at both educational levels in the context of geography education. The research provides evidence that older students benefit more from the learning model. Additionally, the self-regulated learning skills that the students possess at the beginning of the course do not affect their cognitive learning outcomes. Progressive inquiry clearly enhances the motivation levels of middle school students; however, the effect on the motivation level was more ambiguous among the upper secondary students.","PeriodicalId":37057,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Learning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14786/FLR.V6I2.309","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14786/FLR.V6I2.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Adolescents need skills to acquire information and compare, analyze, transform, and experiment with knowledge. However, little research has been conducted on the content and pedagogical practices that are necessary to achieve these skills. This article seeks to contribute to this discussion because geography enables the attainment of the so-called higher-order thinking skills, and the progressive inquiry model provides suitable pedagogical practices. This study provides empirical evidence on the effects of the progressive inquiry teaching method and learning models on cognitive and affective learning outcomes. This paper focuses on learning outcomes among 253 Finnish middle and upper secondary school students. This comparison between different developmental stages reveals the effects of the teaching and learning methods in question. The results indicate that the progressive inquiry method improves cognitive learning results at both educational levels in the context of geography education. The research provides evidence that older students benefit more from the learning model. Additionally, the self-regulated learning skills that the students possess at the beginning of the course do not affect their cognitive learning outcomes. Progressive inquiry clearly enhances the motivation levels of middle school students; however, the effect on the motivation level was more ambiguous among the upper secondary students.
渐进式探究对青少年地理教育认知和情感学习结果的影响
青少年需要掌握获取信息以及比较、分析、转化和实验知识的技能。然而,很少对实现这些技能所需的内容和教学实践进行研究。本文试图为这一讨论做出贡献,因为地理可以获得所谓的高阶思维技能,而渐进探究模式提供了合适的教学实践。本研究为渐进式探究教学方法和学习模式对认知和情感学习结果的影响提供了实证证据。本文重点研究了253名芬兰中学生和高中生的学习成绩。不同发展阶段之间的比较揭示了所讨论的教学方法的效果。研究结果表明,在地理教育背景下,渐进式探究方法提高了两个教育层次的认知学习效果。这项研究提供的证据表明,年龄较大的学生从这种学习模式中受益更多。此外,学生在课程开始时拥有的自主学习技能不会影响他们的认知学习结果。渐进式探究明显提高了中学生的动机水平;然而,对动机水平的影响在高中生中更为模糊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontline Learning Research
Frontline Learning Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信