Metaphors of University Educators: The Expectation Gap with Implications for Educator Wellbeing

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Student Success Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.5204/ssj.2620
Kim A. Johnston, A. Lane
{"title":"Metaphors of University Educators: The Expectation Gap with Implications for Educator Wellbeing","authors":"Kim A. Johnston, A. Lane","doi":"10.5204/ssj.2620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generalised moves to online and more flexible delivery modes of teaching have challenged the perceptions and expectations of university educators worldwide. Congruence around educator role expectations, held by both the educator and their students, therefore is central to educator wellbeing, and by default, student success in a changing university environment. Metaphorical analysis is a way to understand perceptions, expectations, and the realities of university teaching. Extending the work of Saban et al. (2007), this mixed methods study of metaphors of university educators from student and educator perspectives found that while educators and students were aligned in conceptualizing teachers, there were increasing expectations on educators to demonstrate higher levels of humanistic personal qualities while at the same time being experts, accredited teachers, and engaging content creators. Educators however saw themselves as something different to how students see them, pointing to a vulnerability for educator wellbeing. The implications suggest more institutional support is needed for the ‘being and doing’ of teaching and to find better ways to align the expectations of students, universities, and educators. For early career educators, recognising the tension between the reality and aspiration of being a teacher, will go some way towards maintaining educator wellbeing.\n ","PeriodicalId":43777,"journal":{"name":"Student Success","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Student Success","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generalised moves to online and more flexible delivery modes of teaching have challenged the perceptions and expectations of university educators worldwide. Congruence around educator role expectations, held by both the educator and their students, therefore is central to educator wellbeing, and by default, student success in a changing university environment. Metaphorical analysis is a way to understand perceptions, expectations, and the realities of university teaching. Extending the work of Saban et al. (2007), this mixed methods study of metaphors of university educators from student and educator perspectives found that while educators and students were aligned in conceptualizing teachers, there were increasing expectations on educators to demonstrate higher levels of humanistic personal qualities while at the same time being experts, accredited teachers, and engaging content creators. Educators however saw themselves as something different to how students see them, pointing to a vulnerability for educator wellbeing. The implications suggest more institutional support is needed for the ‘being and doing’ of teaching and to find better ways to align the expectations of students, universities, and educators. For early career educators, recognising the tension between the reality and aspiration of being a teacher, will go some way towards maintaining educator wellbeing.  
大学教育者的隐喻:期望差距及其对教育者幸福的启示
普遍转向在线和更灵活的教学模式,挑战了世界各地大学教育工作者的观念和期望。因此,教育工作者及其学生对教育工作者角色期望的一致性是教育工作者幸福感的核心,也是在不断变化的大学环境中学生成功的核心。隐喻分析是理解认知、期望和大学教学现实的一种方法。扩展了Saban等人的工作。(2007),这项从学生和教育工作者的角度对大学教育工作者隐喻的混合方法研究发现,虽然教育工作者和学生在概念化教师方面是一致的,但人们越来越期望教育工作者在成为专家、合格教师,以及吸引内容创作者。然而,教育工作者认为自己与学生的看法不同,这表明教育工作者的幸福感很脆弱。这些影响表明,需要更多的机构支持来“存在和做”教学,并找到更好的方法来调整学生、大学和教育工作者的期望。对于早期职业教育工作者来说,认识到成为一名教师的现实和愿望之间的紧张关系,将在一定程度上保持教育工作者的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Student Success
Student Success EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信