Journal Article Writing Assistance Program: An Effort to Improve Publication in Islamic University

M. Farkhan, Awalia Rahma, Mauidlotun Nisa, M. Azwar
{"title":"Journal Article Writing Assistance Program: An Effort to Improve Publication in Islamic University","authors":"M. Farkhan, Awalia Rahma, Mauidlotun Nisa, M. Azwar","doi":"10.15408/bat.v29i1.30993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis mixed-methods study aimed to explore how the Faculty of Humanities carried out Journal Article Writing Assistance Program (JAWAP) in 2021, and determine its contribution to the participants’ English articles. MethodThis mixed methods research used a convergent mixed methods design that relied on 17 participants’ perception towards its implementation as the main data collected using questionnaire, interview, and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed using correlational statistics and compared with qualitative data to confirm or dis-confirm each other.  FindingsThe study revealed that JAWAP worked in an online scheme where the communication between the participants and reviewers did not occur intensively. The study identified weaknesses in the review process, such as the article’s compliance with the author guidelines, lack of interdisciplinary discussion and collaboration with others, and the deservedness to be published in internationally journals. However, the study shows the JAWAP contributed significantly to the participants’ English articles.   ConclusionJAWAP as an assistance program can help the participants to write quality English articles. To increase its contribution to the English article quality, the faculty should conduct the program intensively during the writing process openly in an intensive communication between reviewers and participants in small groups.","PeriodicalId":33743,"journal":{"name":"Buletin AlTuras","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin AlTuras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v29i1.30993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis mixed-methods study aimed to explore how the Faculty of Humanities carried out Journal Article Writing Assistance Program (JAWAP) in 2021, and determine its contribution to the participants’ English articles. MethodThis mixed methods research used a convergent mixed methods design that relied on 17 participants’ perception towards its implementation as the main data collected using questionnaire, interview, and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed using correlational statistics and compared with qualitative data to confirm or dis-confirm each other.  FindingsThe study revealed that JAWAP worked in an online scheme where the communication between the participants and reviewers did not occur intensively. The study identified weaknesses in the review process, such as the article’s compliance with the author guidelines, lack of interdisciplinary discussion and collaboration with others, and the deservedness to be published in internationally journals. However, the study shows the JAWAP contributed significantly to the participants’ English articles.   ConclusionJAWAP as an assistance program can help the participants to write quality English articles. To increase its contribution to the English article quality, the faculty should conduct the program intensively during the writing process openly in an intensive communication between reviewers and participants in small groups.
期刊文章写作援助计划:伊斯兰大学期刊出版的努力
目的这项混合方法研究旨在探索人文学院如何在2021年开展期刊文章写作援助计划(JAWAP),并确定其对参与者英语文章的贡献。方法该混合方法研究采用了一种收敛的混合方法设计,以17名参与者对其实施的感知为主要数据,通过问卷、访谈和文件分析收集。使用相关统计学对定量数据进行分析,并与定性数据进行比较,以相互确认或不确认。研究结果表明,JAWAP在一个在线方案中工作,参与者和评审员之间的交流并不密集。该研究发现了审查过程中的弱点,例如文章符合作者指南,缺乏跨学科的讨论和与他人的合作,以及理应在国际期刊上发表。然而,研究表明,JAWAP对参与者的英语文章有显著贡献。结论JAWAP作为一个辅助项目可以帮助参与者写出高质量的英语文章。为了提高其对英语文章质量的贡献,教师应在写作过程中集中进行该项目,并在评审员和小组参与者之间进行公开的密集交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信