Phases of the traditional 505 test: between session and direction reliability

Q3 Social Sciences
Richard Clarke, P. Read, M. D. S. Croix, J. Hughes
{"title":"Phases of the traditional 505 test: between session and direction reliability","authors":"Richard Clarke, P. Read, M. D. S. Croix, J. Hughes","doi":"10.1051/sm/2020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Change of direction (COD) testing has commonly reported a single total time to quantify performance despite that tests are made up of a number of different phases. No investigation into these phases has been completed, therefore the aim of this study was to examine the reliability between sessions and directions of the different phases of a 505 test. Twenty-one male youth athletes performed the 505 test in both directions on three occasions. Differences between directions and sessions were determined via a T-test and Two-way ANOVA respectively and a significance threshold was set at P ≤ 0.05. All strategy variables show acceptable relative and absolute reliability in both directions between sessions (ICC = 0.73-0.94; CV = 2.3-6.3%) apart from ground contact time (GCT) (ICC = 0.57-0.68, CV = 14.8–22.4%). Significant differences were identified between session one and three for entry time. Significant differences between directions for exit time on day two and for full approach, entry and GCT on day three. The non-dominant turning direction showed lower relative and absolute reliability between session for entry time (ICC = 0.73 vs 0.89; CV = 6.3% vs 3.7%) and GCT (ICC = 0.57 vs 0.68; CV = 14.8% vs 22.4%). Results indicate the phases of a 505 COD test have high relative and absolute reliability between sessions, although turning directions should be considered independently.","PeriodicalId":52082,"journal":{"name":"Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/sm/2020010","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Change of direction (COD) testing has commonly reported a single total time to quantify performance despite that tests are made up of a number of different phases. No investigation into these phases has been completed, therefore the aim of this study was to examine the reliability between sessions and directions of the different phases of a 505 test. Twenty-one male youth athletes performed the 505 test in both directions on three occasions. Differences between directions and sessions were determined via a T-test and Two-way ANOVA respectively and a significance threshold was set at P ≤ 0.05. All strategy variables show acceptable relative and absolute reliability in both directions between sessions (ICC = 0.73-0.94; CV = 2.3-6.3%) apart from ground contact time (GCT) (ICC = 0.57-0.68, CV = 14.8–22.4%). Significant differences were identified between session one and three for entry time. Significant differences between directions for exit time on day two and for full approach, entry and GCT on day three. The non-dominant turning direction showed lower relative and absolute reliability between session for entry time (ICC = 0.73 vs 0.89; CV = 6.3% vs 3.7%) and GCT (ICC = 0.57 vs 0.68; CV = 14.8% vs 22.4%). Results indicate the phases of a 505 COD test have high relative and absolute reliability between sessions, although turning directions should be considered independently.
传统505测试的阶段:会话和方向之间的可靠性
尽管测试由许多不同的阶段组成,但方向变化(COD)测试通常报告了单个总时间来量化性能。没有对这些阶段的调查已经完成,因此本研究的目的是检验505测试的不同阶段的会话和方向之间的可靠性。21名男青年运动员分别进行了3次双向505测试。方向和时段之间的差异分别通过t检验和双向方差分析确定,P≤0.05为显著性阈值。所有策略变量在会话之间的两个方向上都显示出可接受的相对和绝对可靠性(ICC = 0.73-0.94;(ICC = 0.57-0.68, CV = 14.8-22.4%)。第一阶段和第三阶段在进入时间上存在显著差异。第2天的出口时间方向与第3天的完全进近、入口和GCT方向之间存在显著差异。非优势转弯方向在进入时间上的相对信度和绝对信度较低(ICC = 0.73 vs 0.89;CV = 6.3% vs 3.7%)和GCT (ICC = 0.57 vs 0.68;CV = 14.8% vs 22.4%)。结果表明,505 COD测试各阶段之间具有较高的相对信度和绝对信度,但转弯方向应单独考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite
Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité is a peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of the French Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences (ACAPS). The journal publishes scientific articles related to human movement, physical activity, rehabilitation, sport and performance in a multidisciplinary perspective. All scientific disciplines are represented: physiology, biomecanics, neuroscience, motor control, psychology, sociology, management, history, epistemology. Fundamental, empirical and more applied or technological approaches are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信