Does 29Mhz Micro-Ultrasound Provide Uniform Diagnostic Accuracy Within and Beyond the Peripheral Zone?

F. Luger, A. Gusenleitner, J. Kaar, C. Mayr, W. Loidl
{"title":"Does 29Mhz Micro-Ultrasound Provide Uniform Diagnostic Accuracy Within and Beyond the Peripheral Zone?","authors":"F. Luger, A. Gusenleitner, J. Kaar, C. Mayr, W. Loidl","doi":"10.33552/aun.2019.01.000519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micro-Ultrasound is a new imaging modality designed as a replacement for conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Like conventional TRUS, micro-ultrasound uses an endorectal transducer to produce real-time images of the prostate and surrounding tissue, however operating at 29MHz it does so with a resolution that is 3-fold higher than conventional systems operating at 6-12MHz. This improved resolution gives micro-ultrasound the ability to image structures down to 70 microns, or the average size of the prostate acini, and so resolve tissue-structure detail which is useful in predicting the presence of cancer. First presented in 2013 through a study of radical prostatectomy correlation by Pavlovich CP, et al. [1], micro-ultrasound demonstrated promising improvements over conventional ultrasound in both sensitivity and specificity to predict prostate cancer. This work suffered from a lack of structured interpretation, as it was discovered that the appearance of cancer on microultrasound imaging was more diverse than the simple hypoechoic lesion of conventional ultrasound. Ghai S, et al. [2] provided the required protocol in 2016, along with a retrospective validation using data collected from a biopsy cohort [2]. Since that time, other *Corresponding author: Ferdinand Luger, Department of Urology, Ordensklinikum Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen, Austria. Received Date: September 11, 2019","PeriodicalId":93263,"journal":{"name":"Annals of urology & nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of urology & nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2019.01.000519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Micro-Ultrasound is a new imaging modality designed as a replacement for conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Like conventional TRUS, micro-ultrasound uses an endorectal transducer to produce real-time images of the prostate and surrounding tissue, however operating at 29MHz it does so with a resolution that is 3-fold higher than conventional systems operating at 6-12MHz. This improved resolution gives micro-ultrasound the ability to image structures down to 70 microns, or the average size of the prostate acini, and so resolve tissue-structure detail which is useful in predicting the presence of cancer. First presented in 2013 through a study of radical prostatectomy correlation by Pavlovich CP, et al. [1], micro-ultrasound demonstrated promising improvements over conventional ultrasound in both sensitivity and specificity to predict prostate cancer. This work suffered from a lack of structured interpretation, as it was discovered that the appearance of cancer on microultrasound imaging was more diverse than the simple hypoechoic lesion of conventional ultrasound. Ghai S, et al. [2] provided the required protocol in 2016, along with a retrospective validation using data collected from a biopsy cohort [2]. Since that time, other *Corresponding author: Ferdinand Luger, Department of Urology, Ordensklinikum Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen, Austria. Received Date: September 11, 2019
29Mhz微型超声在外围区域内外是否提供统一的诊断准确性?
微超声是一种新的成像方式,旨在取代传统的经直肠超声(TRUS)。与传统的TRUS一样,微超声使用直肠内换能器来产生前列腺和周围组织的实时图像,但在29MHz下运行时,其分辨率是在6-12MHz下运行的传统系统的3倍。这种提高的分辨率使micro-ultrasound能够成像低至70微米的结构,或前列腺腺泡的平均大小,从而解析组织结构细节,这对于预测癌症的存在是有用的。Pavlovich CP等人于2013年首次提出了一项关于根治性前列腺切除术相关性的研究。[1],在预测前列腺癌症的灵敏度和特异性方面,微超声显示了比传统超声有希望的改进。这项工作缺乏结构性解释,因为发现癌症在微超声成像上的表现比传统超声的简单低回声病变更为多样。Ghai S等人[2]在2016年提供了所需的方案,并使用从活检队列收集的数据进行了回顾性验证[2]。从那时起,其他通讯作者:Ferdinand Luger,奥地利奥氏泌尿外科。接收日期:2019年9月11日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信