Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques for the prediction of air pollution: a case study from China

IF 1.1 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Ishan Ayus, Narayanan Natarajan, Deepak Gupta
{"title":"Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques for the prediction of air pollution: a case study from China","authors":"Ishan Ayus,&nbsp;Narayanan Natarajan,&nbsp;Deepak Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s44273-023-00005-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adverse effect of air pollution has always been a problem for human health. The presence of a high level of air pollutants can cause severe illnesses such as emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or asthma. Air quality prediction helps us to undertake practical action plans for controlling air pollution. The Air Quality Index (AQI) reflects the degree of concentration of pollutants in a locality. The average AQI was calculated for the various cities in China to understand the annual trends. Furthermore, the air quality index has been predicted for ten major cities across China using five different deep learning techniques, namely, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Bidirectional Gated Recurrent unit (Bi-GRU), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Convolutional Neural Network BiLSTM (CNN-BiLSTM), and Convolutional BiLSTM (Conv1D-BiLSTM). The performance of these models has been compared with a machine learning model, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to discover the most efficient deep learning model. The results suggest that the machine learning model, XGBoost, outperforms the deep learning models. While Conv1D-BiLSTM and CNN-BiLSTM perform well among the deep learning models in the estimation of the air quality index (AQI), RNN and Bi-GRU are the least performing ones. Thus, both XGBoost and neural network models are capable of capturing the non-linearity present in the dataset with reliable accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45358,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44273-023-00005-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44273-023-00005-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adverse effect of air pollution has always been a problem for human health. The presence of a high level of air pollutants can cause severe illnesses such as emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or asthma. Air quality prediction helps us to undertake practical action plans for controlling air pollution. The Air Quality Index (AQI) reflects the degree of concentration of pollutants in a locality. The average AQI was calculated for the various cities in China to understand the annual trends. Furthermore, the air quality index has been predicted for ten major cities across China using five different deep learning techniques, namely, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Bidirectional Gated Recurrent unit (Bi-GRU), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Convolutional Neural Network BiLSTM (CNN-BiLSTM), and Convolutional BiLSTM (Conv1D-BiLSTM). The performance of these models has been compared with a machine learning model, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to discover the most efficient deep learning model. The results suggest that the machine learning model, XGBoost, outperforms the deep learning models. While Conv1D-BiLSTM and CNN-BiLSTM perform well among the deep learning models in the estimation of the air quality index (AQI), RNN and Bi-GRU are the least performing ones. Thus, both XGBoost and neural network models are capable of capturing the non-linearity present in the dataset with reliable accuracy.

机器学习和深度学习技术在空气污染预测中的比较:来自中国的案例研究
空气污染的不良影响一直是人类健康的一个问题。大量空气污染物的存在会导致肺气肿、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)或哮喘等严重疾病。空气质量预测有助于我们采取切实可行的行动计划来控制空气污染。空气质量指数(AQI)反映了一个地区污染物的浓度。我们计算了中国各城市的平均空气质量指数,以了解每年的趋势。此外,还使用了五种不同的深度学习技术,即循环神经网络(RNN)、双向门控循环单元(Bi-GRU)、双向长短期记忆(BiLSTM)、卷积神经网络 BiLSTM(CNN-BiLSTM)和卷积 BiLSTM(Conv1D-BiLSTM),对中国十个主要城市的空气质量指数进行了预测。将这些模型的性能与机器学习模型 eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) 进行了比较,以发现最有效的深度学习模型。结果表明,机器学习模型 XGBoost 的性能优于深度学习模型。在估计空气质量指数(AQI)的深度学习模型中,Conv1D-BiLSTM 和 CNN-BiLSTM 表现良好,而 RNN 和 Bi-GRU 表现最差。因此,XGBoost 和神经网络模型都能准确捕捉数据集中存在的非线性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信