Sustainable Public Transportation Evaluation using a Novel Hybrid Method Based on Fuzzy BWM and MABAC

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, M. Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M. Ghahremanloo
{"title":"Sustainable Public Transportation Evaluation using a Novel Hybrid Method Based on Fuzzy BWM and MABAC","authors":"M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, M. Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M. Ghahremanloo","doi":"10.2174/1874447802115010031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is proposed to evaluate sustainable public transportation in Tehran. Evaluation criteria have been identified using the literature and experts’ opinion. The proposed method integrates the fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM) and the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method. a group of three experts determined the weight and importance of each criterion using FBWM. The MABAC method was then used to rank sustainable public transport alternatives.","PeriodicalId":38631,"journal":{"name":"Open Transportation Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"31-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Transportation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802115010031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this study, a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is proposed to evaluate sustainable public transportation in Tehran. Evaluation criteria have been identified using the literature and experts’ opinion. The proposed method integrates the fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM) and the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method. a group of three experts determined the weight and importance of each criterion using FBWM. The MABAC method was then used to rank sustainable public transport alternatives.
基于模糊BWM和MABAC的公共交通可持续评价新方法
本文提出了一种新的混合多准则决策(MCDM)方法来评估德黑兰的可持续公共交通。评估标准已确定使用文献和专家的意见。该方法将模糊最佳-最差法(FBWM)和多属性边界逼近面积比法(MABAC)相结合。由三名专家组成的小组使用FBWM确定每个标准的权重和重要性。然后使用MABAC方法对可持续公共交通方案进行排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Transportation Journal
Open Transportation Journal Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信