Saman Bowatte, Paul Newton, Coby Hoogendoorn, Somrutai Winichayakul, Nick Roberts, Shona Brock, Phil Theobald, Danica Thompson, Hong Xue, Dongwen Luo
{"title":"Lower soil nitrous oxide emissions by a high lipid genetically modified perennial ryegrass line compared to its wild type","authors":"Saman Bowatte, Paul Newton, Coby Hoogendoorn, Somrutai Winichayakul, Nick Roberts, Shona Brock, Phil Theobald, Danica Thompson, Hong Xue, Dongwen Luo","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We describe an experiment where cattle urine was applied at a rate of 420 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, equivalent to 10 L m<sup>−2</sup>, to mesocosm swards of a high lipid genetically modified perennial ryegrass line (HME) and its wild type (WT). We measured N pools and fluxes in the plant and soil, soil microbial populations and N<sub>2</sub>O production. HME plants produced 21% greater biomass than WT (<i>p</i> = .02), resulting in greater N uptake (27% higher in HME, <i>p</i> = .05). Urine N recovery in total plant biomass during the experiment in HME and WT swards were 54.7% and 33.9% respectively. The nitrification potential of soil was significantly lower (<i>p</i> = .01) in HME than WT. Partial least square-discriminant analysis using microbial gene abundance data indicated that HME and WT plant growth induced distinct microbial populations in the soil. These differences in plant soil microbial interactions between HME and WT swards resulted in significantly lower N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from the HME sward. Total N<sub>2</sub>O emissions over the 4 weeks after urine application was 38% lower (<i>p</i> < .03) in HME swards than in WT swards. The next step in this work is to identify the specific changes in HME traits that drive the reduction in N<sub>2</sub>O.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"78 3","pages":"327-337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12616","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We describe an experiment where cattle urine was applied at a rate of 420 kg N ha−1, equivalent to 10 L m−2, to mesocosm swards of a high lipid genetically modified perennial ryegrass line (HME) and its wild type (WT). We measured N pools and fluxes in the plant and soil, soil microbial populations and N2O production. HME plants produced 21% greater biomass than WT (p = .02), resulting in greater N uptake (27% higher in HME, p = .05). Urine N recovery in total plant biomass during the experiment in HME and WT swards were 54.7% and 33.9% respectively. The nitrification potential of soil was significantly lower (p = .01) in HME than WT. Partial least square-discriminant analysis using microbial gene abundance data indicated that HME and WT plant growth induced distinct microbial populations in the soil. These differences in plant soil microbial interactions between HME and WT swards resulted in significantly lower N2O emissions from the HME sward. Total N2O emissions over the 4 weeks after urine application was 38% lower (p < .03) in HME swards than in WT swards. The next step in this work is to identify the specific changes in HME traits that drive the reduction in N2O.
我们描述了一项实验,将牛尿以420 kg N ha - 1(相当于10 L m - 2)的速率施用于高脂转基因多年生黑麦草系(HME)及其野生型(WT)的中胚芽。我们测量了植物和土壤中的氮库和通量、土壤微生物种群和N2O产量。高强度栽培的植物生物量比低强度栽培的植物高21% (p = 0.02),导致更高的氮吸收量(高强度栽培的植物高27%,p = 0.05)。试验期间,高沼气池和野生沼气池的尿氮回收率分别为54.7%和33.9%。利用微生物基因丰度数据进行的偏最小二乘判别分析表明,HME和WT植物生长诱导的土壤微生物种群差异明显。这些植物土壤微生物相互作用在高沼地和低沼地之间的差异导致高沼地N2O排放量显著降低。尿后4周内,HME组的总N2O排放量比WT组低38% (p < .03)。这项工作的下一步是确定HME性状中驱动N2O减少的具体变化。
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.