Olympic Films and Public Memory

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Takeshi Nakaji
{"title":"Olympic Films and Public Memory","authors":"Takeshi Nakaji","doi":"10.1111/ijjs.12092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How is our memory of mega-events structured? This article investigates the relationship between cinema and the Olympic Games. To this end, it first unravels the historical origins of the strong link between the two, as both are symbolic products of the 20th century. The Olympics reaffirm the image of the modern nation-state; the cinematic medium visually represents the Games as spectacle. Leni Riefenstahl's film, <i>Olympia</i> (1938), recorded at the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games, supplies the most enduring imagery of this type. In addition to Riefenstahl's thoughts and methods, this study delves into Kon Ichikawa's <i>Tokyo Olympiad</i> (1965), which was influenced by <i>Olympia</i>. Ichikawa's film, which reflects his artistry and showcases his various skills, won critical acclaim and, intriguingly, precipitated the “document or art” controversy that involved the Japanese state and the mass media. Whether document or work of art, this film has supplied the public with imagery for the 1964 Tokyo Olympic Games—various images that most of us recognize—and thereby played a key role in constituting our memory of them. Therefore, our experience of the Games is a mediated experience through the construction of our public memory. Our memory culture is composed of “prosthetic memories” that are technologically assembled through cinema and act as Freudian “screen memories.”</p>","PeriodicalId":29652,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Sociology","volume":"28 1","pages":"11-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ijjs.12092","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijjs.12092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How is our memory of mega-events structured? This article investigates the relationship between cinema and the Olympic Games. To this end, it first unravels the historical origins of the strong link between the two, as both are symbolic products of the 20th century. The Olympics reaffirm the image of the modern nation-state; the cinematic medium visually represents the Games as spectacle. Leni Riefenstahl's film, Olympia (1938), recorded at the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games, supplies the most enduring imagery of this type. In addition to Riefenstahl's thoughts and methods, this study delves into Kon Ichikawa's Tokyo Olympiad (1965), which was influenced by Olympia. Ichikawa's film, which reflects his artistry and showcases his various skills, won critical acclaim and, intriguingly, precipitated the “document or art” controversy that involved the Japanese state and the mass media. Whether document or work of art, this film has supplied the public with imagery for the 1964 Tokyo Olympic Games—various images that most of us recognize—and thereby played a key role in constituting our memory of them. Therefore, our experience of the Games is a mediated experience through the construction of our public memory. Our memory culture is composed of “prosthetic memories” that are technologically assembled through cinema and act as Freudian “screen memories.”

奥运电影与公众记忆
我们对重大事件的记忆是如何构成的?本文探讨了电影与奥运会的关系。为此,它首先揭示了两者之间紧密联系的历史渊源,因为两者都是20世纪的象征性产品。奥运会重申了现代民族国家的形象;电影媒介在视觉上把奥运会表现为一种奇观。莱尼·里芬斯塔尔(Leni Riefenstahl)拍摄于1936年柏林奥运会的电影《奥林匹亚》(Olympia, 1938)提供了这种类型的最持久的形象。除了Riefenstahl的思想和方法外,本研究还深入研究了市川今的《东京奥林匹亚》(1965),这是受《奥林匹亚》影响的作品。市川的这部电影反映了他的艺术才华,展示了他的各种技巧,赢得了评论界的好评,有趣的是,它引发了一场涉及日本政府和大众媒体的“文件还是艺术”的争议。无论是文献还是艺术作品,这部电影为公众提供了1964年东京奥运会的图像——我们大多数人都认识的各种图像——从而在构建我们对奥运会的记忆中发挥了关键作用。因此,我们对奥运会的体验是一种通过构建我们的公共记忆而中介的体验。我们的记忆文化是由“假记忆”组成的,这些假记忆是通过电影技术组装起来的,就像弗洛伊德的“屏幕记忆”一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信