Comparison of Microhardness of Artificial Teeth with Different Contents After Waiting in Various Liquids

Q3 Dentistry
Ayşegül Göze Saygın, Mustafa Yildirimoğlu
{"title":"Comparison of Microhardness of Artificial Teeth with Different Contents After Waiting in Various Liquids","authors":"Ayşegül Göze Saygın, Mustafa Yildirimoğlu","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1060543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to assess the long-term microhardness of different artificial teeth after waiting in liquids of various pH values. \nMaterials and Methods: Four different artificial teeth [conventional PMMA(Ivostar) as control group), double cross-linked PMMA(DCL), micro-filled composite resin(VivodentPE), nanohybrid composite resin(PhonaresiII)] were used for the study. After the samples fixed on acrylic blocks were immersed in distilled water at 37˚C for 24 hours, initial microhardness (T0) measurements were performed. Randomly selected samples from each group were immersed in liquids with different pH values (artificial saliva, kefir, orange juice, cola). Measurements repeated on the 7th day on the same samples were recorded as T1, and measurements repeated on the 14th day were recorded as T2. The data obtained were evaluated in the SPSS 22.0 program. Friedman and Kruskall Wallis tests were used to compare of the groups. \nResults: While the highest initial microhardness averages were found in the Phonares II group, the lowest average belongs to the Ivostar group. Microhardness findings of all materials measured at different times were obtained in the order of T0>T1>T2. When the data of samples aged in different liquids are compared, significant differences are observed (p0.05) \nConclusions: A decrease in microhardness of materials that are immersed in liquids with different pH values for a long time was observed, and the microhardness of the materials exposed to these solutions is adversely affected.","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1060543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the long-term microhardness of different artificial teeth after waiting in liquids of various pH values. Materials and Methods: Four different artificial teeth [conventional PMMA(Ivostar) as control group), double cross-linked PMMA(DCL), micro-filled composite resin(VivodentPE), nanohybrid composite resin(PhonaresiII)] were used for the study. After the samples fixed on acrylic blocks were immersed in distilled water at 37˚C for 24 hours, initial microhardness (T0) measurements were performed. Randomly selected samples from each group were immersed in liquids with different pH values (artificial saliva, kefir, orange juice, cola). Measurements repeated on the 7th day on the same samples were recorded as T1, and measurements repeated on the 14th day were recorded as T2. The data obtained were evaluated in the SPSS 22.0 program. Friedman and Kruskall Wallis tests were used to compare of the groups. Results: While the highest initial microhardness averages were found in the Phonares II group, the lowest average belongs to the Ivostar group. Microhardness findings of all materials measured at different times were obtained in the order of T0>T1>T2. When the data of samples aged in different liquids are compared, significant differences are observed (p0.05) Conclusions: A decrease in microhardness of materials that are immersed in liquids with different pH values for a long time was observed, and the microhardness of the materials exposed to these solutions is adversely affected.
不同含量人工牙在不同液体中等待后显微硬度的比较
目的:研究不同类型假牙在不同pH值液体中静置后的长期显微硬度。材料与方法:采用常规PMMA(Ivostar)作为对照组、双交联PMMA(DCL)、微填充复合树脂(VivodentPE)、纳米复合树脂(PhonaresiII) 4种不同类型的人工牙进行研究。固定在丙烯酸块上的样品在37℃的蒸馏水中浸泡24小时后,进行初始显微硬度(T0)测量。每组随机抽取样本浸泡在不同pH值的液体中(人工唾液、开菲尔酒、橙汁、可乐)。同一样品第7天重复测量记为T1,第14天重复测量记为T2。用SPSS 22.0软件对所得数据进行评价。使用Friedman和Kruskall Wallis测试进行组间比较。结果:Phonares II组初始显微硬度平均值最高,Ivostar组初始显微硬度平均值最低。所有材料在不同时间测量的显微硬度结果按T0>T1>T2的顺序排列。对比不同液体陈化样品的数据,差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。结论:材料长时间浸泡在不同pH值的液体中,其显微硬度会降低,对材料的显微硬度有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信