An Evaluation of Fit Indices Used in Model Selection of Dichotomous Mixture IRT Models.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1177/00131644231180529
Sedat Sen, Allan S Cohen
{"title":"An Evaluation of Fit Indices Used in Model Selection of Dichotomous Mixture IRT Models.","authors":"Sedat Sen, Allan S Cohen","doi":"10.1177/00131644231180529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare fit indices used for detecting the correct latent class in three dichotomous mixture item response theory (IRT) models. Ten indices were considered: Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the corrected AIC (AICc), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), consistent AIC (CAIC), Draper's information criterion (DIC), sample size adjusted BIC (SABIC), relative entropy, the integrated classification likelihood criterion (ICL-BIC), the adjusted Lo-Mendell-Rubin (LMR), and Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin (VLMR). The accuracy of the fit indices was assessed for correct detection of the number of latent classes for different simulation conditions including sample size (2,500 and 5,000), test length (15, 30, and 45), mixture proportions (equal and unequal), number of latent classes (2, 3, and 4), and latent class separation (no-separation and small separation). Simulation study results indicated that as the number of examinees or number of items increased, correct identification rates also increased for most of the indices. Correct identification rates by the different fit indices, however, decreased as the number of estimated latent classes or parameters (i.e., model complexity) increased. Results were good for BIC, CAIC, DIC, SABIC, ICL-BIC, LMR, and VLMR, and the relative entropy index tended to select correct models most of the time. Consistent with previous studies, AIC and AICc showed poor performance. Most of these indices had limited utility for three-class and four-class mixture 3PL model conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231180529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare fit indices used for detecting the correct latent class in three dichotomous mixture item response theory (IRT) models. Ten indices were considered: Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the corrected AIC (AICc), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), consistent AIC (CAIC), Draper's information criterion (DIC), sample size adjusted BIC (SABIC), relative entropy, the integrated classification likelihood criterion (ICL-BIC), the adjusted Lo-Mendell-Rubin (LMR), and Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin (VLMR). The accuracy of the fit indices was assessed for correct detection of the number of latent classes for different simulation conditions including sample size (2,500 and 5,000), test length (15, 30, and 45), mixture proportions (equal and unequal), number of latent classes (2, 3, and 4), and latent class separation (no-separation and small separation). Simulation study results indicated that as the number of examinees or number of items increased, correct identification rates also increased for most of the indices. Correct identification rates by the different fit indices, however, decreased as the number of estimated latent classes or parameters (i.e., model complexity) increased. Results were good for BIC, CAIC, DIC, SABIC, ICL-BIC, LMR, and VLMR, and the relative entropy index tended to select correct models most of the time. Consistent with previous studies, AIC and AICc showed poor performance. Most of these indices had limited utility for three-class and four-class mixture 3PL model conditions.

二分类混合IRT模型选择的拟合指标评价
采用蒙特卡罗模拟方法比较了三种二元混合项目反应理论模型中用于检测正确潜在类别的拟合指标。考虑10个指标:Akaike信息准则(AIC)、修正AIC (AICc)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)、一致性AIC (CAIC)、Draper信息准则(DIC)、样本量调整BIC (SABIC)、相对熵、综合分类似然准则(ICL-BIC)、调整Lo-Mendell-Rubin (LMR)和Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin (VLMR)。评估拟合指标的准确性,以正确检测不同模拟条件下的潜在类别数量,包括样本量(2,500和5,000)、测试长度(15,30和45)、混合比例(相等和不相等)、潜在类别数量(2,3和4)和潜在类别分离(无分离和小分离)。模拟研究结果表明,随着考生人数或题项数量的增加,大部分指标的正确率也随之增加。然而,不同拟合指标的正确识别率随着估计的潜在类别或参数数量(即模型复杂性)的增加而降低。结果表明,BIC、CAIC、DIC、SABIC、ICL-BIC、LMR和VLMR模型均较好,且相对熵指数在大多数情况下倾向于选择正确的模型。与以往的研究一致,AIC和AICc表现不佳。这些指标大多对三级和四级混合3PL模型条件的效用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信