Policy Implications of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Research

IF 7.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Herman Aguinis, S. Jensen, S. Kraus
{"title":"Policy Implications of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Research","authors":"Herman Aguinis, S. Jensen, S. Kraus","doi":"10.5465/amp.2020.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We identified policy implications of organizational behavior and human resource management (OBHRM) research based on reviewing 4,026 articles in 10 journals (2010–2019). We found that policy implications are underutilized and not part of OBHRM’s zeitgeist because only 1.5% of articles (i.e., n 5 61) included them, suggesting that OBHRM risks becoming societally irrelevant. Societal irrelevance may result in lower perceived value-added, less prestige and status compared to other fields that do offer implications for policy, and less support regarding research funding. However, we see potential for OBHRM research to make meaningful contributions to policy-making in the future because we uncovered several areas that do offer some policy implications, such as labor relations, leadership, training and development, justice and fairness, and diversity and inclusion. We offer a dual theory–policy research agenda focused on (a) designing empirical studies with policy-making goals in mind; (b) converting existing exploratory and explanatory research to prescriptive and normative research; (c) deriving policies from bodies of research rather than individual studies; and (d) creating policies based on integrating theories, fields, and levels of analysis. We hope our article will be a catalyst for the creation and implementation of research-based policies in OBHRM and othermanagement subfields.","PeriodicalId":48215,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

We identified policy implications of organizational behavior and human resource management (OBHRM) research based on reviewing 4,026 articles in 10 journals (2010–2019). We found that policy implications are underutilized and not part of OBHRM’s zeitgeist because only 1.5% of articles (i.e., n 5 61) included them, suggesting that OBHRM risks becoming societally irrelevant. Societal irrelevance may result in lower perceived value-added, less prestige and status compared to other fields that do offer implications for policy, and less support regarding research funding. However, we see potential for OBHRM research to make meaningful contributions to policy-making in the future because we uncovered several areas that do offer some policy implications, such as labor relations, leadership, training and development, justice and fairness, and diversity and inclusion. We offer a dual theory–policy research agenda focused on (a) designing empirical studies with policy-making goals in mind; (b) converting existing exploratory and explanatory research to prescriptive and normative research; (c) deriving policies from bodies of research rather than individual studies; and (d) creating policies based on integrating theories, fields, and levels of analysis. We hope our article will be a catalyst for the creation and implementation of research-based policies in OBHRM and othermanagement subfields.
组织行为与人力资源管理的政策含义研究
我们通过对2010-2019年10种期刊上4026篇文章的回顾,确定了组织行为与人力资源管理(OBHRM)研究的政策含义。我们发现政策影响没有得到充分利用,也不是OBHRM时代精神的一部分,因为只有1.5%的文章(即561篇)包含了政策影响,这表明OBHRM有可能变得与社会无关。与其他确实对政策有影响的领域相比,与社会无关可能导致较低的感知附加值,较低的声望和地位,以及较少的研究经费支持。然而,我们看到了OBHRM研究在未来为政策制定做出有意义贡献的潜力,因为我们发现了几个确实提供一些政策含义的领域,如劳动关系、领导力、培训和发展、正义和公平、多样性和包容性。我们提供了一个双重理论-政策研究议程,侧重于(a)设计具有政策制定目标的实证研究;(b)将现有的探索性和解释性研究转变为规范性和规范性研究;(c)根据研究机构而不是个别研究制定政策;(d)在整合理论、领域和分析层次的基础上制定政策。我们希望我们的文章将成为在OBHRM和其他管理子领域创建和实施基于研究的政策的催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Academy of Management Perspectives (AMP) aims to provide valuable insights to current and future thought leaders, including educators, business writers, consultants, executives, policy makers, and other professionals involved in management practice and policy. The publication seeks to bridge the gap between scholarly research and practical applications by presenting evidence-based approaches to address crucial management issues. AMP publishes research papers that employ quantitative or qualitative evidence, either from a single study or a compilation of studies within a specific field of research. The journal does not accept opinion pieces but encourages articles that focus on the implications of findings for policy and practice rather than theoretical implications. Examples of suitable articles for publication in AMP include practitioner or policy-oriented reviews of empirical studies, descriptive articles that contribute to our comprehension of management practices and strategic approaches, and articles highlighting the practical and policy implications of evidence-based work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信