Probiotics in pregnancy: Inequities in knowledge exchange, attitudes, and use of probiotics in a socio-demographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample of pregnant Canadians

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
L. McKerracher , T. Moffat , M.E. Barker , B. Murray-Davis , K.M. Kennedy , C.J. Bellissimo , E. Yeo , D. Høtoft , L. Zalot , V. Parlette , S.A. Atkinson , D.M. Sloboda
{"title":"Probiotics in pregnancy: Inequities in knowledge exchange, attitudes, and use of probiotics in a socio-demographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample of pregnant Canadians","authors":"L. McKerracher ,&nbsp;T. Moffat ,&nbsp;M.E. Barker ,&nbsp;B. Murray-Davis ,&nbsp;K.M. Kennedy ,&nbsp;C.J. Bellissimo ,&nbsp;E. Yeo ,&nbsp;D. Høtoft ,&nbsp;L. Zalot ,&nbsp;V. Parlette ,&nbsp;S.A. Atkinson ,&nbsp;D.M. Sloboda","doi":"10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pregnancy interventions, potentially including consumption of nutraceuticals like probiotics, represent possible avenues for preventing non-communicable diseases. However, evidence syntheses indicate that probiotic interventions, while effective in managing some pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational diabetes), do not confer health benefits to uncomplicated pregnancies. Messaging around probiotics in pregnancy is mixed, such that people with low-risk pregnancies may nevertheless feel pressure to spend limited resources on (costly) probiotics. To tailor knowledge exchange and support safe, equitable access to pregnancy probiotics when their prescription may be warranted, we need to understand who takes probiotics during pregnancy and under what conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used chi-square and logistic regression analyses of anonymous, cross-sectional survey data from 341 pregnant Canadians of diverse socio-demographic backgrounds to assess which respondents, by socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pregnancy/pregnancy health indicators, were relatively likely to: perceive probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health and/or report taking probiotics during pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-seven percent of respondents perceived probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health; 51 % reported consuming them. Probiotic attitudes and consumption were socio-demographically-patterned: higher-income, post-secondary-educated respondents disproportionately perceived probiotics as healthy and consumed them. There was no evidence of variation in probiotics attitudes or use by pregnancy health indicators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Socio-economic factors may be more important determinants of pregnancy probiotic use in this sample than indications for pregnancy complications. Clear guidelines on pregnancy probiotics that reflect current evidence are needed. Equitable access to probiotics should be facilitated for pregnant people likely to benefit from interventions (i.e., those with certain complications), supporting long-term health equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20049,"journal":{"name":"PharmaNutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmaNutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434423000166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy interventions, potentially including consumption of nutraceuticals like probiotics, represent possible avenues for preventing non-communicable diseases. However, evidence syntheses indicate that probiotic interventions, while effective in managing some pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational diabetes), do not confer health benefits to uncomplicated pregnancies. Messaging around probiotics in pregnancy is mixed, such that people with low-risk pregnancies may nevertheless feel pressure to spend limited resources on (costly) probiotics. To tailor knowledge exchange and support safe, equitable access to pregnancy probiotics when their prescription may be warranted, we need to understand who takes probiotics during pregnancy and under what conditions.

Methods

We used chi-square and logistic regression analyses of anonymous, cross-sectional survey data from 341 pregnant Canadians of diverse socio-demographic backgrounds to assess which respondents, by socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pregnancy/pregnancy health indicators, were relatively likely to: perceive probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health and/or report taking probiotics during pregnancy.

Results

Forty-seven percent of respondents perceived probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health; 51 % reported consuming them. Probiotic attitudes and consumption were socio-demographically-patterned: higher-income, post-secondary-educated respondents disproportionately perceived probiotics as healthy and consumed them. There was no evidence of variation in probiotics attitudes or use by pregnancy health indicators.

Conclusion

Socio-economic factors may be more important determinants of pregnancy probiotic use in this sample than indications for pregnancy complications. Clear guidelines on pregnancy probiotics that reflect current evidence are needed. Equitable access to probiotics should be facilitated for pregnant people likely to benefit from interventions (i.e., those with certain complications), supporting long-term health equity.

怀孕期间的益生菌:加拿大孕妇在知识交流、态度和益生菌使用方面的不平等
背景妊娠干预措施,可能包括食用益生菌等营养品,是预防非传染性疾病的可能途径。然而,综合证据表明,益生菌干预措施虽然能有效控制一些妊娠并发症(如妊娠期糖尿病),但不会对无并发症的妊娠带来健康益处。关于妊娠期益生菌的信息喜忧参半,因此低风险妊娠的人可能会感到压力,需要在(昂贵的)益生菌上花费有限的资源。为了量身定制知识交流,并支持在可能需要处方的情况下安全、公平地获得妊娠益生菌,我们需要了解谁在妊娠期间以及在什么条件下服用益生菌。方法我们对来自341名不同社会人口背景的加拿大孕妇的匿名横断面调查数据进行卡方和逻辑回归分析,相对而言:认为益生菌对妊娠健康有益和/或报告在妊娠期间服用益生菌。结果47%的受访者认为益生菌有益于孕期健康;51%的人表示食用了它们。益生菌的态度和消费是社会人口学模式:收入较高、受过中等教育的受访者不成比例地认为益生菌是健康的,并食用益生菌。没有证据表明益生菌的态度或使用与妊娠健康指标有关。结论与妊娠并发症的适应症相比,社会经济因素可能是该样本中妊娠益生菌使用的更重要决定因素。需要反映当前证据的关于妊娠益生菌的明确指南。应促进可能从干预措施中受益的孕妇(即有某些并发症的孕妇)公平获得益生菌,支持长期健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmaNutrition
PharmaNutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信