COVID-19: accelerator or demolisher of the RME agenda?

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Mathias Falkenstein, U. Hommel, Annie C. Snelson-Powell
{"title":"COVID-19: accelerator or demolisher of the RME agenda?","authors":"Mathias Falkenstein, U. Hommel, Annie C. Snelson-Powell","doi":"10.1108/jgr-12-2020-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to enrich the discussion at the intersection of responsible management education (RME) and the pandemic with new views that explore together the inhibitors of and drivers for a strengthening of RME in the emerging context. On the one hand, the pandemic crisis fosters the social role business schools play by supporting the enhancement of the RME rationale as an idealist foundational pillar of responsible business schools. On the other hand, it invites negative pragmatic responses in the light of financial and competitive disturbances that seem to enlarge the opportunity cost of moving RME forward.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe essay puts forward arguments that help dissect the inherent contradictions and synergies between idealistic and pragmatic business school strategies, as they are impacted by the dynamics of COVID-19. The analysis serves to frame a discourse over the extent to which the pandemic crisis is acting as an accelerator of the RME agenda or instead brings the risk of demolishing what has been achieved so far.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors form an opinion of the emerging factors that promote and inhibit RME in business schools as they grapple with the challenges of the pandemic whilst recognizing the inherent contradictions faced in their strategic choices and resourcing.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn light of the growing emphasis on RME in the literature, this study challenges the degree to which the agenda has already become firmly rooted as a core organizational and educational theme in business schools. By doing so, it delivers an assessment of RME progress as a relevant strategic lever for business schools, whilst nonetheless being at risk of back-sliding.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-12-2020-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to enrich the discussion at the intersection of responsible management education (RME) and the pandemic with new views that explore together the inhibitors of and drivers for a strengthening of RME in the emerging context. On the one hand, the pandemic crisis fosters the social role business schools play by supporting the enhancement of the RME rationale as an idealist foundational pillar of responsible business schools. On the other hand, it invites negative pragmatic responses in the light of financial and competitive disturbances that seem to enlarge the opportunity cost of moving RME forward. Design/methodology/approach The essay puts forward arguments that help dissect the inherent contradictions and synergies between idealistic and pragmatic business school strategies, as they are impacted by the dynamics of COVID-19. The analysis serves to frame a discourse over the extent to which the pandemic crisis is acting as an accelerator of the RME agenda or instead brings the risk of demolishing what has been achieved so far. Findings The authors form an opinion of the emerging factors that promote and inhibit RME in business schools as they grapple with the challenges of the pandemic whilst recognizing the inherent contradictions faced in their strategic choices and resourcing. Originality/value In light of the growing emphasis on RME in the literature, this study challenges the degree to which the agenda has already become firmly rooted as a core organizational and educational theme in business schools. By doing so, it delivers an assessment of RME progress as a relevant strategic lever for business schools, whilst nonetheless being at risk of back-sliding.
2019冠状病毒病:RME议程的加速器还是破坏者?
目的本文的目的是丰富在负责任管理教育(RME)和流行病交叉点的讨论,以新的观点,共同探讨在新兴背景下加强负责任管理教育的抑制因素和驱动因素。一方面,大流行危机通过支持强化RME理论,使其成为负责任商学院的理想主义基础支柱,促进了商学院发挥的社会作用。另一方面,鉴于金融和竞争扰动似乎扩大了推进RME的机会成本,它会引起消极的务实反应。设计/方法/方法本文提出的论点有助于剖析理想主义和务实的商学院战略之间的内在矛盾和协同作用,因为它们受到COVID-19动态的影响。这一分析有助于构建一种论述,论述这场大流行病危机在多大程度上加速了区域贸易和经济机制议程,或者反而带来了破坏迄今取得的成果的风险。在商学院努力应对疫情挑战的同时,认识到其战略选择和资源配置面临的内在矛盾,作者对促进和抑制RME的新因素形成了看法。鉴于文献中对RME的重视程度越来越高,本研究对该议程已经成为商学院组织和教育核心主题的程度提出了挑战。通过这样做,它提供了对RME进展的评估,作为商学院的一个相关战略杠杆,尽管如此,它仍有倒退的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信